 |
|
 |
 |
Tuesday, July 31, 2007 |
 |
 |
Monday, July 30, 2007 |
 |
Sunday, July 29, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
A case under the Anti-Dowry Act has been registered against Union HRD Minister Arjun Singh, his wife Beena Singh, son Abhimanyu Singh, grandson Abhijeet Singh and three others at a police station on Sunday, police said.
The case has been registered on the direction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandausi, on a complaint by Madhvendra Singh, the father of the Union Minister's daughter-in-law Priyanka Singh, Moradabad district police chief Prem Prakash said.
The court had ordered the registration of the case on July 27 but the FIR was registered at Chandausi Kotwali police station on Sunday, he said.
Madhvendra Singh has alleged that his daughter's in-laws had been demanding a Mercedes car and a flat from him and his daughter was being tortured when their demand was not met, Prakash said. [link]
Image: UNICEF Comics - Say No to Dowry [pdf]
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 9:14 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
After Goa, AP could become the next Congress state on the verge of imploding.
Eight people, including two women, were killed and eight others injured when police opened fire and rained lathi blows on them in Khammam district during the statewide bandh called by the CPM and CPI on Saturday. The bandh was to protest "police highhandedness" against leaders and cadres of the two parties on Thursday while picketing collectorates in the districts. [link] Media reports strongly emphasized: (a) Police opened fire only when they were pelted with stones (b) The police were vastly outnumbered (c) CM YSR Reddy suspended a top cop and ordered a judicial enquiry
Compare and contrast this with media reports during the Chattisgarh protests and Gujjar crisis. This being a Congress state, no poetic flourish is forthcoming from our Sec-Soc friends.
Dr. Reddy also appeared on Devil's advocate. The interview segments are highly educational for those interested in understanding Indian politics [video 1, video 2, video 3]. It may be noted that Dr. Reddy recently got a lot of flak when he used most unparliamentary language against his political opponent Chandrababu Naidu.
Dr. Reddy is running quite a racket over there. Land grab, intimidation, mafia style operations, illegal mining permits. You have to really watch him on the Devil's Advocate interviews, he breaks into smiles at the most inopportune moments. This is a man who does not care, in the numbers game the fractious Indian politics has become, he is beyond judicial reach, since he brings in precious support using identity based politics.
Perhaps the most atrocious thing Reddy has done is trying to silence the Eenadu media and newspaper group:
A nasty situation has developed for media freedom in South India's largest State — with the dominant Eenadu group targeted by a State Government that is at the receiving end of aggressive investigative journalism. The modus operandi of the Rajasekhara Reddy Government has an element of ingenuity: it is to attack the financial base of the media group, ostensibly targeting the owners' HUF financial institution, Margadarsi Financiers, while claiming that no attempt has been made to curb either the daily newspaper or the television channels of the group. [link]
When the Congress rag Hindu reports such items, you can safely assume the cut runs much deeper.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 10:21 AM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Saturday, July 28, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Come to think of it, the mango must be a mysterious enough fruit for foreigners that they need a step-by-step instruction on cutting and consuming it. Some folks like to suck on the sweet nothingness of the mango seed, long after the flesh is gone. Of course the foreigners miss out on the fun.
The nuke deal is one such issue all sides will keep on sucking, even after the issue is bone dry. We have not gone into too much analysis of the nuke deal. I am sure the NationalInterest folks and many others will have a lot more to ruminate on this topic for days to come.
So, we decided to take a layman's approach and see through what the deal is about. Specifically, we took this Tehelka article to put some structure around our thought process. If you find any inaccuracy in what we say here, please let us know.
To summarize, the nuke deal can be explained as follows:
The Nuke deal will allow India to procure civilian nuclear technology from American firms in exchange for some covenants on its military nuclear programs.
Several questions immediately pop out of that statement alone.
- How is Iran able to procure nuclear technology? How about China?
- Will we get a discount? Any freebies?
- Who will guarantee that the stuff that we get are the good stuff and not some watered down version?
- Who will make sure that there is no Bofors style underhand dealing?
- Do we really need nuclear energy? Will it be viable? How long before we scale up (current capacity meets 3% or energy need)?
- Any estimate and timelines on how much of India's energy needs will be met from nuclear power?
- How will we finance the technology? Will the overall picture make economic sense? If the costs are too prohibitive, maybe we will be better off just using coal and oil.
- How about the green lobby? Will they like the risk exposure (nuke! ooooh!)
As you can see, this is decidely murky territory and we haven't even gone into the other aspect yet!
So let's see what the people's paper has to say on the deal. As mentioned, we do not wish to go into the details of the issue at this point, so we will restrict ourselves to some eye popping quotes from the article (written by Ram Jethmalani, no less):
- The criticism [ed. of A Gopalakrishnan, former chairman of the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board] , from whatever quarter it emanates, just makes no sense.
- India is not preparing for nuclear aggression against any one, nor is it threatened with nuclear aggression at the moment.
- The Chinese are not interested in Indian territory now. Their target is the Indian market and we have allowed them complete capture.
- The International Court of Justice or a commission acting under its supervision can turn out a binding judgment in a fraction of the time that we have wasted on useless negotiations for the last 45 years.
- Can India continue to make progress without the deal? The answer again is a resounding 'no'.
- The most conclusive evidence in favour of the deal is that all our known enemies are against it.
- We must be grateful to Pakistan that though it has lost its democracy, its President Pervez Musharraf has realised that Mahatma Gandhi was right that impurity of means is bound to taint even a pure end.
The Government can not pretend that they are helping out the Bush administration by keeping the documents secret. For far too long socialist ponzi scheme after ponzi scheme has robbed our nation. The recent exposes of CIA links, explosive books by RAW insiders, clearly indicate that nefarious deals have been done in the past, to the great detriment of the people. The invokation of Mahatma Gandhi is a red flag right there.
Deal or no deal, we deserve to see the goddamn document, in full.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 4:09 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Skinny little Mohammed Haneef, he grew up, his beard filled out. No sooner than the Auzzies dropped him like a political hot potato, he was lapped up by the eagerly waiting political opportunists.
Offstumped reports:
The excitable Abhishek Singhvi has handed himself a slap in the face by allowing his emotions to displace sobriety to celebrate the the prevailing of the rule of law in a foreign land. [...] Coming especially on a day when it took 17 years to award death sentence to the accused in the 1993 Mumbai Blasts, one would have expected the Congress to have performed some honest introspection on its Executive Delinquency rather than jump on the opportunity to score a few political points. Fairness and Justice in Australia mean very little by way of National Interest to India and Indians. Abhishek Singhvi and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh would do well to introspect on their perverse celebration of the same. [link]
The celebration is expected. You have to remember that there is no room for ambiguity in the Jeep driving Jihadi case. But no one is talking about Kafeel Ahmed or his brother Sabeel Ahmed. These names were drowned in the constant media and political rhetoric surrounding the Haneef case. To the casual observer, the case never even existed, it was a conspiracy at a global level to malign the names of minorities.
The simplified version of this case asserts that Haneef just happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time. Indeed you can not blame a man if he has a black sheep in the family. Unfortunately there are unexplained facts in the case and the facial hair is not the last of them. First, a note on the beard. It could be due to outgrowth during the period of detention but this picture does not suggest so. Also, Auzzie prison regulations clearly state that a prisoner can shave or shower if they so desire. There are serious discrepancies in the interview Haneef gave that even the most liberal media can not discount.
The global terror networks see India mostly as a facilitator for now. With its easy come easy go policy, lax law enforcement, chalta hai chalne do attitude and a people friendly Government coupled with its relative modernity (i.e. access to technology, travel and modern financial systems), makes it particularly suitable to do planning, procurement and training related activites. Ever wonder why there are so many cases of RDX seizure? They keep showing up on news every other day. Every week there is a new report on fake currency racket involving the ISI.
Like it or not, terror has been outsourced. Funny that it should start at Bangalore!
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 12:03 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Thursday, July 26, 2007 |
 |
Wednesday, July 25, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Barkha Dutt, super star journalist and editor-in-chief of NDTV wrote an article called Haneef: India's hypocrisy which was published on 21st July. The tone of the article was strikingly similar to a post on our blog titled Dor, published on 16th July.
Now, we are not saying that the mighty Barkha Dutt reads our blog. While all the other journos were calling Auzzies racist etc., we took a contrarian view, just like Barkha did. That's all we are saying.
It came to our notice that the same article was published in Australian media, now the title was changed to Haneef - the view from India. This version was slightly modified from the originally published article, which is understandable.
A quick recap on the major themes as put forward in the media and blogs:
Indian MSM: Haneef good, Bush bad, Howard puppet, Auzzies racist, Hindu bad, Modi bad. Most Indian blogs: PM idiot, why he losing sleep? Let sleeping dogs lie. Our blog: Haneef Muslim - Auzzies civil -> media mad, Saudi tough -> media silent. Hindutva blogs: Hang Afzal, who is Haneef?
Barkha took a contrarian approach, as pointed out earlier. She argues that Indians are hypocrites because they let Hindus play rough shod on innocent Muslims detained for terrorism while they are crying foul over Haneef's alleged bad treatment by Auzzies.
Barkha's article is full of anecdotes such as:
More recently, Tariq Dar, a Kashmiri model who made it big in Bangladesh was locked away on charges of terrorism. [..] The judge who acquitted him was passionate in her ruling. "It’s astonishing," she wrote that "without an iota of evidence against him, Dar was kept in custody for 90 days which could be a lifetime for any common citizen." But do you remember anyone you know sharing her anger?
Well, I remember at least two who shared the judge's anger. Arundhati Roy and Barkha Dutt.
Then Barkha goes on to cite the following example to prove how Auzzies are so good:
According to the Herald Sun, an Australian citizen, Roy Somerville, who has never met Haneef emerged as an unlikely benefactor and offered to post the ten thousand dollars in bail because he believes in a 'fair go'. The newspaper quotes the Brisbane resident as saying that if the police only charged Haneef for giving his cousins an old sim card, then it was "bullshit". Can you imagine anyone in India bailing out a stranger implicated in a case of terrorism?
Let's see here, who was that eminent lawyer in India who offered his services for Afzal? Who was the then CM of UP who gave a clean chit to SIMI? Which party in India said that POTA was not needed and that ordinary laws for tackling burglaries etc. were enough to tackle a few misguided youth?
Barkha would have run amock with her indignation at Indian hypocrisy but for the fact that she had to stop right before she killed many of her own articles. Articles where the Western imperial forces are conspiring to destroy world peace. That is why she does not venture into the actual legality of the case. These are murky territories and it requires the skills of a trapeze artist to prevent one from falling into icky material. Even as we cry ourselves hoarse discussing Haneef, India is handing out very tough sentences to the ones implicated in the '93 terror attacks. These sentences can not be justified unless you are willing to discuss issues such as nationalism, national threat, attack on a sovereign country etc.
Overall Barkha's article seemed like a watered down version of early Roy when she was starting out on the lecture circuit. There is hypocrisy alright, but the hypocrisy lies in understanding the explosive political potential of the Haneef case and exploiting it to the hilt.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 9:06 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Tuesday, July 24, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 It's a classic tale of small towns and big dreams -- only this time round, the dream almost came true for Sushila Mishra, a resident of Nadda Village in the Bangah District of Bihar. She scored 91 per cent in her class XII boards and also cleared the IIT-JEE exam, but Sushila wasn't able to get a seat at IIT because her father couldn't afford to pay Rs 40,000 as admission fee. "It was my dream to study at IIT. I heard from somewhere that the state government is helping poor students. I was hopeful, but I didn't get any help," says the dejected girl. Sushila's father approached various banks for a loan, but failed to get any because of his weak financial status. [link]
I guess there is some substance to the rumor spread by vicious anti-reservationists that piss poor Brahmins do exist.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 6:44 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Sunday, July 22, 2007 |
 |
 |
Saturday, July 21, 2007 |
 |
Friday, July 20, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 The cookbook is a professionally printed 5.5 x 8.5 softcover book. The recipes are official Navy recipes that serve 100, so if you are cooking for a crowd this book will be extremely useful. We have also scaled the recipes down to 6-8 servings so that you can prepare Gitmo meals for your family. Some of the recipes are Baked Tandouri Chicken Breast, Mustard-Dill Baked Fish, Lyonnaise Rice, and Fish Amandine. The recipes in the cookbook are standard Navy recipes that have been modified for the detainees to comply with halal requirements. We've tried them. They're pretty good, and easy to make. Most have 8 or fewer ingredients and can be made quickly. Read more here.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 7:33 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Tuesday, July 17, 2007 |
 |
Monday, July 16, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 The latest film from Nagesh Kukunoor has the same problems his movies usually do, sentimental, cliched and overlong. You can see the official website here.
The plot of the movie is rather simple. A Muslim man and a Hindu man, both economic migrants, share an apartment in Saudi Arabia. The Hindu man gets killed under suspicious circumstances and the Muslim man is condemned to death. The only way his fiancee can bring about his acquittal is by undertaking the near impossible task of tracking down the family of the deceased in rural Rajashthan and getting a Maafinaama signed by his widow. Time is running out and all sorts of odd things happen ....... Even as the media is doing backflips over the alleged misfortune of Mohammed Haneef, detained under suspicion of indulging in terrorism related activities, similar tales are unfolding without catching anyones attention.
Salim, who went to Saudi Arabia in September 2003 for employment, was caught from his friend's house by officials, who had raided the latter's room in May 2006 for narcotic drugs. Salim, 30, was working as a mechanic in Riyadh.
In a memorandum to the ambassador on Thursday, Bichaminabi claimed that no drugs were seized from Salim's room or from his custody during the raid.
"He was wrongly implicated in this case. Salim being a poor, uneducated person and having no knowledge of Arabic, was unaware of the proceedings and was having no means or knowledge to defend himself and convince the court of his innocence," Bichaminabi said in the memorandum. [link]
For some reason, Sagarika Ghosh didn't make a show on this and call the Saudi authorities racist. Is she pandering to the Muslim elite?
A quick fact check reveals that far more Indians are incarcerated in the Arab world, often under frivolous charges.
The recent arrests of Indian doctors in terror-related cases is only a drop in the ocean of Indians incarcerated in prisons scattered across the world. On the last count, there were over 6,000 Indians in foreign jails. The good news however, is that the number may be coming down and not rising.
Almost one-third of these prisoners are in Saudi Arabia (1,116), followed by the UAE (825). Add Bangladesh (893), Singapore (791), Pakistan (655) and Mala-ysia (545) and these six countries account for more than three-fourths of all Indian prisoners in foreign jails. [link]
Meanwhile, the response of the Auzzie press and human rights groups have been excellent to say the least. Their coverage and protests against the issue has been effective so far. Read some of it here and here.
Granted that her hubby just won one of those prizes and she is feeling overly zealous, but we just wish Sagarika exercised a bit more restraint while throwing around terms like racism, casteism etc. Given the volatile situation in India, this sort of irresponsible journalism may lead to serious headaches.
A typical racist Australian.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 9:05 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Sunday, July 15, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 In a development that could drive a wedge into India-China relations, the CIA has revealed declassified information on American policy and thinking that were kept secret for decades.
They also paint Nehru as a naive and romantic statesman who trusted the Chinese. The documents claim that Nehru kept disagreements on the border issue out of public domain, to maintain his relationship with China. [link]
"Love blossomed" between a "lonely" Jawaharlal Nehru, the first prime minister of the country, and the last Viceroy of India Lord Mountbatten's wife, Edwina, who had other "lovers" before, says her daughter.
Pamela Mountbatten, who fondly called Nehru "Mamu" (maternal uncle), has used diary entries and extracts from family albums as documentary evidence to write India Remembered: A Personal Account of the Mountbattens During the Transfer of Power . [link]
Hmmm, looks like they made quite a Mamu out of Chachaji.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 9:27 AM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Saturday, July 14, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
A letter by Gandhi, reportedly written just 19 days before his death went up for auction at Christie's. For a country where bullock carts are a common sight in most major cities, our Government acted on a frenetic pace to stop the auction and acquire the said letter.
Apparently this letter was the last ever written by Gandhi. Well, maybe not. In any case, the letter is safe and sound and is back in India where it belongs.
The same zeal was not exhibited in releasing the full text to the public. For something as important as this, where the highest level diplomatic intervention and an undisclosed sum of money was used to procure this symbol of secularism, the public needs to see the stuff. Unfortunately, it does not look like the full text disclosure is forthcoming. Perhaps we will need to depend on people friendly interpretations that are being released in bits and pieces.
According to some sources, in his last letter, Gandhi called for better treatment of religious minorities. But from many reports, it appears that the subject matter of the letter was the dwindling sale of the Urdu edition of Harijan, a magazine Gandhi published. Clearly the folks that this magazine was intended for wasn't showing too much enthusiasm.
Meanwhile Gandhi has been rather unceremoniously dropped from the British school curriculum.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 7:07 AM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Friday, July 13, 2007 |
 |
Wednesday, July 11, 2007 |
 |
Tuesday, July 10, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Hawala is an informal money transfer system which operates below the financial systems radar. But it's not a terrorist activity only that the hawala route funds, but also the Naxal activities. Who is funding the Maoists and their expanding armed guerrilla movement? There is now speculation that a number of NGOs in Bihar are funding the training of Maoist guerrillas. Twenty-two NGOs in Gaya district have been issued a show-cause notice for their Maoist links. [link] CNN-IBN also ran "investigative" reports that conclude it is easy to send large sums of money abroad using Hawala rackets, without any official documentation. POTA anyone?
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 7:57 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Monday, July 09, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Rajnikanth is perhaps the biggest star in India at the moment. The box office figures speak for themselves. The recent flick Sivaji drew crowds into a mad frenzy all over the globe, causing mini riots from Bangalore to Malaysia. The movie was able to transcend language barriers to a great extent. Two bloggers found this the hard way when their blogs drew over thousand comments apiece [confused, Anuradha Sengupta].
Unfortunately, the biggest stars also make the biggest shakedown targets.
CHENNAI: A Congressman on Monday sought a ban on screening- Sivaji-the Boss , the tamil film starring superstar Rajnikant, for allegedly defaming UPA Chairperson Sonia Gandhi and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.
The Congressman, M Satyamoorthy, on Monday filed a PIL in the Madras High Court, seeking the ban on the plea that the film portrayed Gandhi and Singh along with the villain, intending to defame them and the Congress.
The PIL, which is likely to come up for hearing on Tuesday, also sought Rs.50 crore from Rajnikant, film producer A V M Saravanan and Director Shankar as damages to the Tamil Nadu Congress Committee for "defaming" the leaders in the movie. [link]
I think this is the first time an entertainment industry related PIL seeks such a large sum of money. The politics behind this is highly confusing, a line of dialog from the movie (heard on the trailer) says: the rich get richer, the poor get poorer. This appears to be straight out of the election manifesto. From whatever I have heard about the movie so far, I doubt if the audience would even notice the pictures of Gandhi and Singh amid such concentrated action. On the other hand, it is doubtful that such a movie will depict anything remotely politically incorrect for the relevant demographic.
I will not speculate if this is a result of an uneasy alliance between DMK and Congress (with the latter solidly being at the receiving end). I will grab a DVD the first chance I get. This is a movie I just can't miss.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 11:27 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Sunday, July 08, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
First a little quiz. Why this picture and why is this relevant? What movie is this from?
Stakes have been raised once again in the presidential election. I just read the transcript of Rajnath Singh Devil's advocate interview and sure enough, some skeletons appeared to have tumbled out of Mr. Shekhawat's closet.
According to the transcript, there appears to be four principal charges against Shekhwat, who had been hitherto touted as Mr. Clean of Indian politics.
1. He accepted bribe as a young policeman during the British era and was suspended for that. 2. He had cases against him dropped during his tenure as chief minister. 3. Some land related scandal involving his son-in-law. 4. He was an MLA from MP while he had his residence in Rajasthan. Now, I think the 4th charge is rather hypocritical. Our esteemed PM happens to be an MP from a constituency in Assam.
The Presidential election represents the very fibre of our democracy and it needs to be held by persons of the most impeccable track record. Just by raising these issues, the charges against Pratibha Patil will not go away. At the same time, Mr. Shekhawat needs to answer these questions ASAP.
There was yet another very serious charge against BJP that many of their allegations against Pratibha Patil were manufactured. Apparently Pratibha Patil's bio never said she was founder president of a bank. Well, I found a version of the bio [pdf] on the web which suggests otherwise. I also suspect some spring cleaning was performed. Someone needs to do a proper post mortem, an improper burial may lead to ghost sightings.
Meanwhile, two more things caught my notice. While the allegations of accepting bribe as a cop needs to be answered, I think it is a monumental blunder to imply there was anything improper in accepting British employment by Shekhawat.
"When people left behind everything to join the freedom struggle responding to Mahatma Gandhi’s call, Shekhawat thought it fit to be part of the repressive colonial police," party spokesman Abhishek Singhvi said. "No one knows whose ideology motivated him but the fact remains that he left the force only when India became independent," he said, urging Shekhawat or his campaign managers to explain this part of his past now that he was contesting for the highest constitutional position. [link]
Remember these were the days of Ahimsa. You were supposed to lead a dual existence, accept British salary during the day and wear khadi in the evening and sing Raghupati Raghava. Who accepted British employment during those days? Well, almost everyone, including some great names. Indian soldiers were a proud part of British army during WW II with many valiant victories to their credit.
The second item was nothing but a veiled threat.
On the other hand, the NDA too needs to temper its assault on Patil as it builds Shekhawat's campaign. Patil is, after all, very likely to become Head of State, and the NDA, as the main opposition, will have to deal with her. Midway through the next President’s term will come a general election and a new Lok Sabha. Getting shrill against Patil would be justified if there were a real chance of beating her in the contest. It is fair to raise noises about a rival candidate — especially when there are substantive issues to raise — but the NDA might want to calibrate its opposition in tones that do not become a liability later. [link]
I am not sure what is being implied here. There is a very dangerous message embedded in this. On the other hand, knowing the sort of loyalty Patil feels for the Gandhi family, it is a rather moot point.
I don't know about you, but I want a clean and competent president, someone I can look up to and respect.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 3:54 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Saturday, July 07, 2007 |
 |
Thursday, July 05, 2007 |
 |
Wednesday, July 04, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 The United States of America:
Date of Birth: July 4, 1776 Constitution adopted: September 17, 1787 Number of amendments: 27 Year of last amendment: 1992 (limits on Congressional pay, previous: 1971, 1967, 1964, 1961, 1951, 1933) Typical Text of amendment: "Prohibits the federal government and the states ......." Republic of India:
Date of Birth: August 15, 1947 Constitution adopted: January 26, 1950 Number of Amendments: 94 (and counting) Year of last amendment: 2006 [link] Typical text of amendment: "Nothing shall prevent the state from making any special provision..."
Note: The officially recognized intellectuals in India reject nationalism and patriotism. Barbarindian recommends that the Government of India put an immediate stop to all independence day/republic day celebations (perhaps using another constitutional amendment) and use the funds for feeding hungry street children. We can not allow a virulent emotion such as nationalism to sprout. These celebrations might put the wrong ideas into the heads of Indian youth.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 10:49 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Tuesday, July 03, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
The HIViro worship continues and now new twists and spins are being added to the already troubling problem.
Painful though the attitude of untouchability during her delivery, what is more painful now for the woman is that the doctors have stopped her from breastfeeding her child.
They fear that the child might get infected with the HIV virus as well if breastfed and the five-day-old baby is being given powdered milk as of now.
Outraged local NGOs and social workers have come to the aid of the hapless couple saying that being HIV positive does not mean one cannot breastfeed their child. [link]
Yeah, the NGOs are medical experts now. Meanwhile take a look at this WHO report:
With the onset of the HIV/AIDS epidemic, however, and the recognition that HIV-infected mothers can transmit HIV to their infants through breastfeeding, specific recommendations apply to infants born to HIV-infected mothers. The overall aim of these recommendations is to achieve the ultimate goal of increasing child survival, while reducing HIV infection in infants and young children. Mother-to-child transmission of HIV can occur during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, during delivery, or at any point during breastfeeding. The risk through breastfeeding is cumulative; the longer the HIV-infected mother breastfeeds, the greater the additional risk of transmission through breastfeeding. [link]
It is highly likely that the family in question contracted HIV via the husband, who went whoring. But media hails these folks as victims. The only reason the media is interested in such stories is the allusion of untouchability which allows them to indulge in another round of Hindu bashing.
Meanwhile no efforts are being made to enact strong laws with strict penalties for errant spouses who expose their families to this disease. The report goes on to claim that while India spends millions on AIDS awareness, for many people being HIV positive continues to spell untouchability. We all know how these millions are spent, by staging fake kissing shows.
It would help if at least some of these millions were spent in telling people that HIV spreads mostly through utterly irresponsible and reckless behavior such as whoring and needles.
[Note: It would be interesting to know Pratibha Patil's views on this issue. I hear she is quite enthusiastic about sterlization etc. ]
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 6:53 AM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Sunday, July 01, 2007 |
|
 |