 |
|
 |
 |
Saturday, September 29, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
The blogger we mentioned in the previous post received some comments on her post and then responded to them. Here is her comment, reproduced in full:
Hi all, thank you for stopping by, taking the time to read the letter from FAOW, and leaving your thoughts. There are a couple of issues I'd like to quickly clarify so that we can, if necessary, take this discussion further.
First, Mayuresh, thank you for your insights. You haven't been rude at all, so don't let that be a worry. I haven't visited the link you directed me to as I can respond immediately to your points. You're right, the SMS itself cannot be classified as communal, perhaps jingoistic. I do think however, that sending that SMS to a Muslim Indian may be perceived of as communal.
Dijo points out, quite rightly I think, that the SMS could have been sent to everyone or several people in the reporter's phone book. It's possible that he didn't target one Muslim, but a group of people whose religion was irrelevant to him. In that case we can either say that he's thoughtless to have included a Muslim name or secular because he sees no difference between Muslims, Hindus, Christians etc. when making an India versus Pakistan joke. Fair enough.
Then too, for a reporter at a national daily to do so is at best unprofessional, at worst irresponsible. He clearly didn't know the activist at FAOW well enough for her reaction and decision to approach his Editor, rather than him directly, proves so.
We can certainly give the reporter the benefit of doubt unless one knows that he has sent or tends to send similar SMS's only to Muslims.
However: I've received so many similar messages, vitriolic and unarguably anti Muslim in the India-Pakistan context, that I have begun to feel that this is a subject which we must all deal with, with some care and sensitivity towards others. I felt, and tell me if you agree, that the behavior of the media and of the crowds at the match was perhaps the best I have ever seen at an India-Pakistan match. Spirit like this embodies what sport is truly about, while SMSs as sent by the TOI reporter do quite the opposite.Pointing out that Shoaib Malik makes pro Islamic comments is in my mind rather childish and illogical. He did it and therefore so can we? I'd rather it be he did it, but we certainly won't. [link]
Her comment validates our theory that it was likely a case of mass SMS forwarding or at the very least these nasty women didn't even care to investigate whether it was. She also didn't think the message is communal.
So let's see here:
- the SMS itself cannot be classified as communal, perhaps jingoistic
- the SMS could have been sent to everyone or several people in the reporter's phone book
- sent to a group of people whose religion was irrelevant to him
- we can either say that he's thoughtless [..] or secular
- We can certainly give the reporter the benefit of doubt
But they didn't even think twice before killing a guy's career?
Also, see the potent absurdity in the blogger's explanation. If the reporter were secular, sending the message would be ok. Else, he would be considered thoughtless. I don't think the concept of "benefit of doubt" is clear to the blogger. Benefit of doubt applies when there are valid charges but ambiguous evidence. Here the crime was fictional and the charges possibly libelous. It will be cold comfort for Mr. Balkrishna after he loses his job and then receives the said benefit of doubt.
Just because there are other, vitriolic and unarguably anti-minority messages going around and other instances of other dudes heckling minorities, these women thought they would take a hapless dude and slap on charges him they themselves don't believe are true. Even encounter killings have a better logic built into them.
At this point we are not even angry, just sad. We appeal to FAOW to withdraw the letter and issue an apology to the reporter.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 8:07 AM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Thursday, September 27, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Technology spurs some curious cultural phenomena. Take for instance mass SMS messages. SMS is highly popular in Asian countries, so much so that in some South Korean and Taiwanese movies, there are sometimes whole SMS sequences. The screen is split into two, the protagonists are shown furiously SMSing each other while the native language transcript plays out at the bottom, subtitle style. Now, here is the kicker, you are already watching with subtitles on. Imagine the confusion. Anyway, we digress.
So here is how mass SMS works (for the benefit of those in the cellular-technology challenged Western countries). Some smart aleck comes up with a supposedly funny or interesting message and SMSes it to everyone on his contact list. Silly perhaps, but it does happen. Each recipient in turn forwards it to everyone on his contact list. Sometimes they snowball into a huge chain SMS.
So, one day, you are bored and sitting in your office. This happens to be the day India had won the T20. Your euphoria has already faded away, bringing you back to harsh realities. Yeah, the evening commute too. Suddenly, twang! An SMS!
"Pak ko sharafat sikha denge, Hind ki taakat dikha denge… Ae Pak, humse punga no lena varna, JOHANNESBERG main kya, LAHORE main TIRANGA lehra denge, jai hind."
Out of sheer habit you proceed to click the buttons in a familiar sequence. Forward -> Select Contact -> All -> Send. You don't even stop to think. You have done it a zillion times.
The next day the sky literally falls over your head. You are summoned to your manager's office upon arrival and tersely informed that you are no longer employed with the organization.
That was a somewhat fictionalized account of what could have almost happened to Times of India reporter Mr. Balkrishna. Still confused? Read this in full.
Although at this point we are merely speculating about the circumstances, but there is overwhelming evidence supporting our hypothesis. We took the phrase and searched on the web. It looks like the particular SMS has been going around a lot. As a matter of fact it might have originated, albeit in a different context and somewhat different form in 2004.
Now, exactly what part of the message is communal? Let's rephrase it a little bit and see:
"Australia ko sharafat sikha denge, Hind ki taakat dikha denge… Ae Australia , humse punga no lena varna, JOHANNESBERG main kya, CANBERRA main TIRANGA lehra denge, jai hind."
Is Pakistan a friendly nation? Yeah, there are those track II people and all, but have you forgotten this? Surely things like that will bring out some passionate reaction from at least some people in a country of a billion. Even if Mr. Balkrishna were to single out a Muslim female and specifically send this message to her (which we totally doubt), how exactly does it make him communal? This is wrong at so many levels. We are told that minorities are as loyal to the country as anyone else. We are constantly being castigated for allegedly casting aspersions on the allegiance of minorities. So, how are we to expect that a minority might take umbrage at an anti-Pakistani remark?
These qustions will never be asked and proper investigations will never happen. Any person who admits to being Hindu is communal by default. For Hindus, Jai Hind is communal. Pakistan, humse panga na lena is communal. Basically we are expected to live as second class citizens and give up freedom of speech and religion.
A group of nasty females have descended upon the poor Mr. Balkrishna like vultures. They are baying for his blood. They want to send him to the purgatory before his time has come. Fortunately for Mr. Balkrishna, his boss turned out to be a rather stoic chap. He rejected the rabid group's first appeal. But make no mistake about it, they are not going to stop there. Mr. Balkrishna should seek alternate career options.
The blogger who is up in arms over the incident, did not react to this or this. But she went ballistic in condemning the outright communal Mr. Balkrishna for threatening and abusing the sovereignty of another country. Apparently this sort of way over the top reaction and possible lies and propaganda is supposed to foster a goofy feeling of peace and communal harmony.
Mr. Balkrishna has already committed a cardinal sin. He just happens to be a Hindu forced to live in a secular nation.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 7:42 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Wednesday, September 26, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Economist Dr. Ila Patnaik, who writes a weekly column for Indian Express, wrote a report card for the UPA Government.
She is a right of center economist and a fan of Milton Friedman. This means that she is not going to get one of those Bharat* awards anytime soon. But she writes well. Check out her column on investment in states (Tamil Nadu has dropped to 9th place in per capita investment) and the dubious ways the UPA Government is controlling inflation. Her scathing column on our financial policy shows the true colors of our Harvard Educated FM. She has also spoken out against the sorry state of affairs in our Public Distribution system.
Here is report card, reproduced in full. Things have changed somewhat since this was written.
Two Years of the UPA Ila Patnaik The good, the bad and the ugly
The good
Nuclear deal
For decades, India had a principled stance that it would not give up nuclear weapons. In return, the world strangled India's ability to import Uranium and thus make nuclear energy. Suddenly, that is history. The US and India have entered into a historic deal, whereby Indian nuclear weapons will be accepted by the world, and the world will be willing to sell fuel and reactors to India. This is great news for low cost electricity generation in India. It also removes a long-standing irritant that was holding back deeper friendship between India and the US, two natural allies on the global stage.
Railways
What happens when you mix the worst piece of Indian infrastructure (railways) with the politician from whom people expect the least (Lalu Prasad Yadav)? Magical results! The performance of the railways has been simply astounding. A far reaching reforms process has begun, by permitting the entry of the private sector into container transportation. Someday, the railways will be like roads:
the government will own the rails but multiple private companies will compete in offering trains. And we will remember Lalu Prasad Yadav for having started it all.
Fiscal revolution
For decades, we used to bemoan the Indian crisis on the fiscal deficit. Then came the rescue in the form of the FRBM Act, initiated by Yashwant Sinha, supported by Jaswant Singh, and seen through by P. Chidambaram. Far-reaching tax reforms were initiated, including the VAT and and an attack on the "exemption raj" highlighted by Kelkar. The deficit is now down to just 3.7%. A lower deficit means the government is grabbing less resources, and more money is available for investment.
Airports & civil aviation
Aviation has been revolutionised, first by the entry of new airlines. In a moribund sector that was trapped in the business interests of Indian Airlines, Air India, Jet Airways and Sahara, suddenly, we have competition! Prices have crashed and the middle class is flying. Tourism has prospered like never before. The second revolution has been unleashed, even though results are not on the table yet - that of privatisation of the airport. Now we can dream that the Delhi and Bombay airports will look as wonderful as the Delhi Metro. Praful Patel did what a Congress minister would never have been able to do.
Capital account convertibility
After years of a deadlock, the PM and the FM are ready to move on to the next big milestone of an India that is growing up: opening up the capital account. The RBI is still dragging its feet, having setup a committee for "fuller" convertibility as opposed to "full" convertibility. But it will be hard for the RBI to hoodwink this PM and this FM, and within 10 years, the Indian Rupee could be one of the great hard currencies of the world.
The bad
Wrong taxes
A great part of the "fiscal revolution" described above was rationality in taxation. We have slashed customs, shifted to VAT, lowered rates, and removed exemptions. But in the UPA years, a series of wrong taxes have crept back. The education cess, the securities transaction tax and the cash withdrawal tax -- all these are flat wrong. One expects better when an economist is the prime minister! The reformers have to now settle in for a ten-year fight to get rid of these.
Mindless expenditure on Education
The government is pouring huge money into its "flagship program" - the Sarkari Shiksha Ahiyan (SSA). But there is no evidence that SSA works. Independent tests show that our children continue to learn little at government schools - e.g. ONE HORRIBLE FACT: ONLY HALF THE STUDENTS IN CLASSES II TO V CAN SUBTRACT TWO DIGIT NUMBERS. What is needed is fundamental educational reform - not a more bloated government that spends more and more on dysfunctional institutional mechanisms.
Crippled Oil policy
The world price of petrol goes up. India imports petrol. The Indian price of petrol should go up. Obvious? Not if you are Mani Shankar Aiyer or Murli Deora. Both these ministers have derailed the effort at getting the government out of price controls in the oil sector. We are doing this exactly wrong: subsidising consumers to use more scarce oil. Men and nations will only do the right thing after exhausting every reasonable alternative.
6th pay commission
As Yashwant Sinha is reported to have said, the 5th Pay Commision "nuked Indian public finance". Now, in a shallow attempt at manipulating the next general elections, Manmohan Singh has embarked on the 6th Pay Commission. He did not need to do this. Now, the devil is in the details. If he finds good economists to drive the 6th pay commission, it can even do some good. More likely, he won't get fiscal hawks, and the 6th Pay Commission will nuke Indian public finance again. We learn from history that we learn nothing from history.
NREGA : Unbounded expenditures?
This is one way of generating employement that even Communist China did not think of. Let people dig holes and the government pay them. We have also discovered a new way of redistribution. The better off you are, the bigger the transfer to you. So a worker in a poor state will get Rs 60 and a worker in a rich state Rs 120. And, as to how much will be spent after all State governments have finished competing with each other to make the centre pay whatever minimum wage they fix, even the finance ministry has no decent estimates.
Stalled PFRDA Bill
India is on the cusp of a demographic transition. Waves of young people are coming into the labour force. This is the perfect time to catch them into a modern pension system, where each person can build up a personal hoard of pension wealth to shelter himself in old age. The New Pension System was a fundamental reform, initiated through extensive public discussion from 1998 to 2002. The UPA has been hijacked by the trade unions - who represent 2% of India - and has completely stalled the pension reform. We are losing valuable years. Years from now, starving old people will remember the UPA for this.
Stalled disinvestment
Arun Shourie did yeoman service exposing the massive scale of theft from PSUs by the political class - whether it is cronies of ministers consuming free rooms at ITDC hotels or it is cronies of bureaucrats selling expensive chicken to ITDC hotels. His jihad on privatisation stirred up this hornets nest of various crooks feeding on PSUs. But his accomplishments - such as the sale of VSNL or TCS - were major victories of the NDA. The UPA has killed off privatisation / disinvestment at the central level. West Bengal continues to powerfully move forward with privatisation. Remember Great Eastern. But the UPA behaves asif what is good enough for West Bengal is not good enough for India. Think BHEL.
Divide and Conquer: Higher education
There must be something wrong with higher education - the NDA had Murli Manohar Joshi and the Congress has Arjun Singh. Top universities in the world are begging to be permitted to setup campuses in India. Instead of a mere 3,000 seats at IIT, we could have 30,000 seats at university campuses in India run by Harvard and Stanford. Foreign producers have transformed our TVs and our cellphones, but clearly higher education is not important enough to benefit from the same reforms, and we are stuck in a Stalinist model of education. All we get is a tiny increase to accomodate quotas.
Rebuilding the planning commission
Modern market economies do not have planning commissions. The NDA was making progress on driving down the importance of the planning commission. A few more years of that, and it would have been possible to close down the planning commission. Now the UPA has done damage by putting a key player in cabinet into the planning commission, and resurrecting the role of the planning commision.
The ugly
SEZs: The mother of all exemptions
Cost: Rs 1,000,000,000,000. Biggest benefit: Tax exemptions to real estate developers. Exports will get some tax breaks too, but nothing compared to what the developers will get. Land acquisition will displace ordinary people on a scale that will make the Narmada dam look like small change. With tax havens inside India, Caymen Islands will pale into insignificance. The country does not benefit. The real estate buyer does not benefit. The government does not benefit. A huge benefit goes to the real estate developers. Why this giant gift to real estate developers. One can only wonder how much election funding will flow out of this trillion rupee handout.
UPA versus FRBM
Indian fiscal was in a nightmarish state by the late 1980s. Manmohan Singh began India's fiscal recovery in the early 1990s. After him, every finance minister has fought on this question - P. Chidambaram, Yashwant Sinha and Jaswant Singh. Getting the central fiscal deficit down to 3.7% of GDP has been a great achievement, and is already generating results through a higher investment rate. And the FRBM promises us the nirvana of a fiscal deficit of no worse than 3% by 2008-09, and that too only for the purpose of capital expenditure. Alas, this glorious achievement is under extreme attack from the UPA. The SEZ Act - the mother of all exemptions - will contaminate growth of tax revenues. The NREG and the 6th pay commission will contaminate expenditures. The UPA is in a mood to roll out more and more foolish welfare programs. By 2009-10, the entire 15-year effort of fighting India's fiscal crisis could have been undone. The UPA could be remembered for having destroyed a marvellous 15-year piece of work. It won't be long when Moody's and S&P catch on and the FDI-FII numbers start dwindling.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 5:56 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Monday, September 24, 2007 |
 |
Saturday, September 22, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
If Arundhati Roy were a painter, she would have loved the brush on the left. She really did use some broad strokes to paint a fantasy filled picture of a "corrupt" judiciary, using the atypical example of the Justice Sabharwal (retired Hon'ble CJI) case, in a recent article.
This case is not getting the due attention because Lord Ram is on everyone's mind these days.
If there is one issue that attracts an unanimous vote of confidence from all parties, it is the idea that the judiciary wields too much power.
Ideally our politicians would like to be able to decide the outcomes of every court case. Starting from the quota case to the 123-agreement to the Ram Setu destruction conspiracy - they want to be the ultimate arbiters.
A problem with our bleeding heart liberals is that they appear to have no sense of scale. The alleged Sabharwal case is tiny compared to even the most garden variety scams pulled by politicians. Laloo still roams free, not only that he is still doing immense damage. Shibu Soren was let go. The land grab scams going on at a massive scale in Andhra, Kerala, Bengal etc. are too numerous to list.
As noted earlier, scions of politicians get preferential land allotments at Agricultural rates and scarcely anyone even raises an eyebrow. Arundhati Roy herself built a dream bungalow on illegally acquired land.
The judges do have enormous power but they are like knights whereas the politicians are like queens on a chessboard. Politicians control everything from law enforcement to the bureaucracy. They also have enormous powers over the fate of a lot of people. Judges are severely handicapped. It would be only under the rarest of circumstances that a judge can align the stars so that the outcome of a case can have a material impact. Also, politicians never retire.
It is difficult for a communist to understand a constitutional democracy. In their world (non-existent), there are the happy people and the people's leader. Goods and services appear out of nowhere, perhaps by divine intervention. In reality they come through massive aids given by capitalist countries, e.g. North Korea, Cuba, 70s India etc.
So, Arundhati Roy gets it wrong once again. It is our politicians who are the real Gods.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 12:44 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Just about two weeks ago, CNN-IBN hosted a TV show analyzing the results of an opinion poll conducted by the venerated CSDS. A number of politicians and subject matter experts including Yogendra Yadav, CSDS supremo, were on the show.
The very first thing that struck us were the outfits of the spokesmen of India's two biggest political parties. BJP spokesman Ravi Shankar Prasad wore a dark brick red Kurta over white pajamas. A garish dress no doubt for such a formal occasion. But look at what Congress spokesman Abhishek Manu Singhvi is wearing! A black leather short-sleeved shirt, with yellow-gold patterns running along the buttons, around the collars and across the front pocket. The last time we saw someone in an outfit like that was Bappi Lahiri.
Anyway.
Apparently this was the biggest opinion poll of its kind, a total of 18,000 respondents were surveyed all across the country. In the words of Yogendra Yadav (note: all transcripts ours):
Yogendra Yadav: This being a very crucial occasion and mid-term elections increasingly almost certain , we wanted to make sure that we wanted to do a poll which is almost a mock mid-term poll ..... here it is then we spread it out this is truly representative..... rural urban the same proportion as in country. 73% rural, 11 - 12% Muslim, 18% Dalits, 45% Women - this is microcosm of India. The opinion poll revealed a vote difference of almost 10% between UPA and NDA. This translated into an immense difference in terms of seats (267 UPA, 133 NDA). Host Rajdeep Sardesai asked Prasad to react to this.
Ravi Shankar Prasad: Rajdeep, we have also learned a little experience of watching your surveys. In 2004 these projections gave us a big lead and there was no hostility against the NDA Govt. And what the results came about? I very acutely recollect one comment from Yogendra that a party in power initially gets a big boost in these surveys but when the concrete election campaign starts ...
Rajdeep then asked Yogendra Yadav to comment on this.
Yogendra Yadav: Absolutely and it's a fair point and this particularly operates in those states where UPA is in power at the center and also at the state level so there may be built an element of bias, so we have tried to correct it, we have carefully tried to eliminate but we can not give guarantee that this will not happen..
Fast forward several minutes and now we come to the point where they are discussing the predictions for Gujarat assembly polls.
Rajdeep Sardesai: One man, and this is another significant finding of our poll, seems to be bucking the trend of anti-incumbency. Remember he faces dissidence within his party almost since the time he came to power... severely criticized by many political analysts for his roll during Gujarat 2002, now as Gujarat prepares to go to the polls look at what our figures are saying.... Narendra Modi is holding firm, he is likely to get we believe 54% votes as against Congress' 43% if elections in Gujarat assembly are held tomorrow. Yogendra, any riders here?
Yogendra Yadav: One rider is one given already by Mr. Ravi Shankar Prasad very important one, that in any pre-election poll, the ruling party, there is a bias in favor of the ruling party which we need to be careful about and second we must not underestimate [] what is happning to BJP at the national level .... its inability to form an alternative in presence of problems in the Congress, is happening to Congress in Gujarat.
This got us entirely confused. What is it Mr. Yogendra Yadav, was a correction really done to prevent a known bias or was it not?
What a difference a mere two weeks makes. Perhaps these results do not appear so valid in the backdrop of the Ram Setu controversy. During the same time period, C-Voter conducted another opinion poll and arrived at different results. For comparison, also check out qualitative predictions of an independent blogger.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 12:01 AM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Thursday, September 20, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Chak De is the breakout Bollywood movie everyone is talking about. A review/analysis is overdue and will be up soon.
Meanwhile, we found this cringe inducing review of the movie on Tehelka:
Assisted by a Mayawati-like lady, Shah Rukh takes the talented, scrappy bunch of girls and moulds them into a killer team. The usual happens — tough training schedules, few players rebel, camps form, Coach resigns, then a killer moment of realisation and team spirit emerges. The crucial hockey sequences are shot beautifully and edited crisply. [link] This, from a bunch of folks who drop words like casteist, sexist, racist, capitalist at people who have a different political opinion. This shows the new lows our self-styled intellectual class people are capable of stooping to.
By the way, that Mayawati-like lady (called Krishna in the movie) is a supremely talented actress. In the movie she plays her difficult role as assistant coach with great aplomb. You can read more about Vibha Chibber here.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 11:01 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Wednesday, September 19, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
It turns out that most of the profits shown by the Indian Railways under Lalooji's amazing management skills accrued mostly due to accounting tricks. Many independent analysts had secretly opined about this - although their opinions got silenced by Laloo's adulating admirers.
Laloo has been claiming that the railways made a profit of Rs 21,578 crore in 2006-07. But the actual figure was Rs 11,000 crore. Here's the secret of Laloo's added profits: - Rs 9,000 crore pension funds shown as cash surplus
- Miscellaneous funds-Rs 2,500 crore-included in earnings
- Rs 1,700 crore due to the Indian Railway Finance Commission as dividend for lease of wagons put in the profit account
- Profits shored up by showing advance earnings for 2007-2008 in last year's balance-sheet
- Monies in the suspense account-funds promised but not yet transferred-reflected in the earnings/profits
- Tonnage carried by freight trains raised despite repeated objections and safety concerns. This brought in Rs 5,000 crore.
- Hidden costs to passenger tickets earned the railways Rs 325 crore [link]
As one official put it, "The turnaround is probably one-third true, one-third well-orchestrated publicity, one-third jugglery of figures."
The one-third true part would have come from the booming economy and a naturally increased demand for freight trains.
The worrying part is that a lot of this was achieved by putting the lives of the aam aadmi at risk. Under Laloo, railways overloaded their wagons and allowed local passengers to flood reserved trains. We will not speculate if the recent increased spate of railway robberies or molestations is a result of this.
This story also vindicates Nitish Kumar who had claimed earlier that he deserved credit for the turnaround. Well, had Nitish Kumar not undertaken a Rs. 17,000 crore infrastructure hardeining, we would perhaps see many Hyderabad flyover type collapses of bridges.
So, what about the various felicitations of leading management schools etc. heaped on Laloo?
The IIM study did make Laloo the man of the moment. So much so, visiting students from the Harvard Business School, Wharton and MIT were queuing up to study the miracle he had wrought. Or so it was projected. Now it seems that the visit by the students of the Harvard Business School in December 2006 was not to study any railway turnaround; they had merely called on the rail minister as part of their Camp India programme. Outlook contacted Seth Cohen, one of those students who had attended Camp India. He had this to say: "The visit was informal," he said, "arranged by our Indian hosts. It was not connected to any academic project." Ditto the MIT students toasted and hosted by Laloo.They came to India during their spring break in April 2007; the railways was another diversion during their eight-day break.
Do read the whole article.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 9:38 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Just came across this post at retributions. The same old tired theme, but this one comes with a twist. Apparently Azim Premji has to hide his Muslim identity in order to hold on to his wealth in a country full of fundamentalist and discriminatory Hindus. Awwwww, my poor little rich Muslim, so much trouble to hold on to his piggy bank of just $17B.
This got us curious. We searched for the author of the article, one Shri Yaroslav Trofimov. Guess what, even today WSJ ran another story by this author on its front page.
In India, 'Untouchables' Convert To Christianity -- and Face Extra Bias By YAROSLAV TROFIMOV September 19, 2007; Page A1
MEDIPALLY, India -- Every Sunday, women and children gather to pray in a tiny, whitewashed church on the edge of this southern Indian village, sitting cross-legged on blue plastic sheets as they sing Christian hymns.
The men don't dare to come. "If they are seen in the church, the officials will be informed," says Vatipally Aharon, Medipally's Baptist pastor. [link]
Basically, the thesis of the latter article is that Dailt Christians and Dalit Muslims are denied their right to education, which according to the author, can often mean "the difference between grinding poverty and a glimmer of hope for better life".
There is no denying the fact that the conditions of Dalits still remain very dismal. But these propagandists attempt to demonize a section of people who have very little, if anything to do with it. Social Activist Chandrabhan Prasad openly admits that Dalits do not face any discrimination in urban areas. There are no buses that say privileged only.
A number of homegrown propagandists lend credibility to these stories. Little research is done and the fancy tales are further embellished.
Shri Yaroslav Trofimov has published articles in WSJ before, they range from financial topics to India's endangered lions. Only recently he appears to have turned his attention to India's human rights violations. Perhaps this is because he has just published a book.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 7:54 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Tuesday, September 18, 2007 |
 |
 |
Monday, September 17, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Some more milk leakage from the mammaries of our welfare state.
NEW DELHI: In the last three years, Rs 31,585.98 crore worth of wheat and rice meant for the poorest of the poor was siphoned off from the public distribution system.
Last year alone, Rs 11,336.98 crore worth of foodgrain that the government is supposed to distribute to the needy at subsidised prices found its way into the market illegally.
Every year, India's poor are cheated out of 53.3% of wheat and 39% of rice meant for them. With the exception of 11 states and Union Territories, there is largescale diversion of PDS grain across India. And, these 11 states and UTs seem to be faring better only because the others are so far ahead in the dirty business. [link]
The government claims and the intellectuals would have you believe that socialism works. In reality the country is running on its own momentum. It is a miracle that the poor can survive at all. Meanwhile what we have at the top end can at best be described as crony capitalism.
If you don't find the above troubling, read about the fake currency racket. This thing runs to perfection.
Spotting the difference, especially in the Rs 1000 notes, is a tough ask. The only visible difference between a real and a fake note seems to be the image of Mahatma Gandhi on the watermark that doesn’t seem clear in a fake one. "The quality of these notes is very good. They are made in a bank note press and even experts can't tell them apart,” says Deputy Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, Brijesh Singh.
The Mumbai police have nabbed four Bangladeshis travelling on genuine tourist visas for carrying Rs 1.28 lakh in fake, right into the heart of India’s financial capital. These notes are so perfect that they even pass the ultraviolet test and a discerning banker in a hurry wouldn't spot the difference. [link] Unfortunately good governance and ground realities are not considered important enough issues for election. The party that generates the most catch-phrases wins. Right now the American liberal playbook seems to be in vogue. We are debating minutiae of religion while making heady trips to a largely vainglorious past at various opportune moments (1857, 1944 etc.).
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 1:27 AM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Sunday, September 16, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
In the latest turn of events, the doyens of CNN-IBN have perhaps decided that the Ram Setu issue is getting too hot to handle. Therefore, it is trying to steer the issue towards what always works, i.e. the Aam Aadmi. As you know, Aam Aadmi always trumps Ram.
According to this report:
Local fishermen say the Vishwa Hindu Parishad has hijacked the real issue - the livelihood of the thousands of fishermen settled there – to meet political ends. They say the dredging of sand from the seabed and the limestone blasting – required for the construction to get underway – will affect fish populations and wreck the fragile marine ecology. “The break the rocks here using big ships. When all this (debris) is thrown in the fishing area, it affects our livelihood. Our fishing nets are torn due to these broken rocks,” says a fisherman. [link] The video can be found here. Since we do not understand Tamil, we could not ascertain if the fisherman on camera indeed said this:
Vishwa Hindu Parishad has hijacked the real issue.
The voice over did not contain the above statement. There is a world of difference between the above and:
- Local fishermen say there is another, more real issue.
- CNN-IBN thinks local fishermen think that VHP hijacked the issue, but did not say it. It was assumed anyway.
- CNN-IBN thought it would be cool to have local fishermen say there is another, more important real issue and CNN-IBN thinks VHP hijacked it.
- CNN-IBN thinks that it would be cool if local fishermen actually said "VHP hijacked the real issue".
This is bizarre.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 12:48 AM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Saturday, September 15, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
July 2007:
American space agency NASA has said that the structure of sand bars and rocks situated in the Palk Strait between India and Sri Lanka, known as Ram Setu or Adam's Bridge in maps, is a natural phenomenon and not a man-made structure. This was announced Saturday by N.K. Raghupathy, CEO, Sethusamudram Corp Ltd, at a press conference here when he revealed the contents of an email received in this regard from NASA's Johnson Space Centre. A few days back, the company sent an email to NASA to know whether Ram Setu was a made-made structure. "This evidence contradicts claims that said it (Ram Setu) was created out of human activity," Raghupathy told reporters. [link]
September 2007:
US space agency NASA says pictures taken by its astronauts do not prove the existence or otherwise of a manmade Ram Setu bridge as mentioned in the Hindu epic Ramayana.'Some people have taken pictures taken by our astronauts to make their claim. No position can be taken on the basis of these photographs in any way,' Braukus said when asked to comment on the controversy surrounding the site of the proposed Rs.24 billion Sethusamudram canal project off India's southern tip. 'The age, substratum, geological structure or anthropological status of the ocean bed in Palk strait cannot be determined by the astronauts' photographs. So there is no basis for these claims,' Braukus said. [link]
It is also true that a number of Hindu organizations and individuals had claimed that the Setu was man made on the basis of the very same photographs. But a Government official lying on record, do you see a problem with that?
Why the hurry? Why this desperation?
Ashok Malik writes:
That aside, projections have been made about the economic non-viability of Sethusamudram. It is possible that all of these are wrong, but the Government has not bothered to politically sell the issue. Instead, the overriding reasons for pushing ahead seem to be granting lucrative dredging contracts to flunkies of the DMK and its Ministers. [link via Sandeep] Note the sheer hypocrisy of the Government's handling of this project (with dubious economic benefits) versus the 123-Agreement (which at least in theory has strong economic benefits). They want to destroy the Ram Setu ASAP. The 123 has been put on hold.
These antics certainly do not inspire any confidence in this dysfunctional Government. A bunch of anti-Hindus are masquerading as seculars. They can barely hide their glee at our predicament. This controversy is also a breather for the Congress and allows it to shift the focus from very damaging issues such as surging farmer suicides, the unsolved terror attacks in Hyderabad etc. It is no coincidence that this controversy comes close at the heels of the communal quotas in Tamil Nadu.
Ram Setu is a question of faith and respect. It is also a question of staving off future, far more damaging consequences.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 10:36 AM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Friday, September 14, 2007 |
 |
Thursday, September 13, 2007 |
 |
Wednesday, September 12, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
As we noted a few times earlier, Mayawati is the biggest problem for Congress for the upcoming mid-term polls (which will happen sometime in 2008). However, for Mayawati, the biggest problem right now is keeping the law and order situation under control.
Mayawati has already been betrayed by Congress. She supported Pratibha Patil in exchange for a massive aid package for UP. The package isn't forthcoming, they are giving her the runaround. Our reading is that Congress simply can not afford to make an alliance with Mayawati. If they do, it will be an implicit acknowledgement that Mayawati can be a viable alternative to Congress for Dalit upliftment. This is a huge problem. It is well known that Maya wants to be the PM, eventually. There are more immediate issues, Haryana may turn out to be an action replay of UP.
Quite naturally, Congress friendly media has been running a smear campaign against her. Bogus stories such as 100 days of Mayawati, Mayawati kicks out Reliance, Mayawati paid off her brother etc. are making rounds.
Let's come back to Mayawati's number one issue right now. It is clear that nefarious elements are trying their level best to start trouble in UP. This is the primary reason Mayawati had to give Reliance the boot. Since then, Mayawati has banned college elections and started an initiative to completely overhaul the police force.
It directly follows that Congress is going to make an alliance with SP. They have two common vote banks. Without Congress, SP does not have a leg to stand on. SP can do Congress' bidding to create trouble for Mayawati. UP has a lot of seats in the Lok Sabha. Meanwhile, the UNPA alliance is unraveling.
Add all this together and you will hear the wedding bells ringing.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 10:11 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Monday, September 10, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Ramachandra Guha sure has a knack for stereotyping. In a recent column, he called Punjabis cheats. Now he claims that "we" have a violent streak (thanks to Sandeep for bringing this to our attention).The question is, who is "us"? The final para of the column offers some clues, it is Hindu men.
So we are violent, claims Guha. Can we have some benchmark here please? Are we more violent than Genghis Khan? How about the Japanese during the height of their imperial triumph? The caliphate? Crusaders? Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao? Vikings? American settlers in the early days? Darfur marauders? Also, will this benchmark be applied in real terms with some statistical backing (say per capita casualties, violations etc.) or will it be administered through mind reading?
Some of our sec-soc friends are actually right. We do need real universities. Since almost every kid is doing computers these days, we are seeing some serious scarcity in the liberal arts arena. People like Guha are jumping in to fill the void.
Guha claims that Subhas Chandra Bose was violent because he gave the following speech:
"Friends! My comrades in the War of Liberation! Today I demand of you one thing, above all. I demand of you blood. It is blood alone that can avenge the blood that the enemy has spilt. It is blood alone that can pay the price of freedom. Give me blood and I promise you freedom." (Burma, 1944, speech as Indian National Army commander) Blood? Ooooh! So scary! Bring me the smelling salt.
Now let's see here. Here is an example of a typical speech by an army commander when he is about to send his troops in harms way:
"Boys, I want you to piss your pants, throw your rifles and run back to your mommas." (England, 1944, General Patton) Just kidding. He said something to the effect that he didn't want those sons of bitches (meaning the troops) to die for their country. He wanted them to make the other sons of bitches (meaning the Germans) to die for their country. (full speech).
Violent? A commander delivering a rallying speech before sending his troops into war. Violent? Huh?
Guha mixes excerpts from the Congress election manifesto, the Guardian newspaper, heresy evidence and his own interpretation of religion and culture to prove that we are - well, violent. Apparently every other historical text is wrong but his. The world war never happened. The Brits left solely because of the steely determination of Gandhi and Nehru. Guha finds roots of Subhas Bose's violence in the cult of Kali. Has he even taken the trouble of researching Subhas Bose? Bose's father had gurus from both Shakto and Vaishnava traditions. Bose was most influenced by Rishi Aurovindo's philosophy. In real life Bose was the most amiable person possible, not the bloodthirsty animal Guha wants to paint him like.
This is seriously funny. Richard Nixon was a Quaker, Jimmy Carter a Southern Baptist. Look what happened! By the way, Guha is a pure Tamil (as far as we know), in case you are wondering.
Most of the article is basically gibberish, bearing no resemblance to actual history and offering no real insight by way of analysis. As usual, he plays the victim:
As it happens, those who lost the political argument continue to have millions of followers and admirers. The chief architect of Indian freedom was Gandhi; the chief architect of Indian democracy, Jawaharlal Nehru. However, were a poll taken among middle-class men, Savarkar, Bhagat Singh and Bose would all garner more votes than Nehru and - in some states and among certain communities and classes - even more votes than Gandhi.
Now you begin to see Guha in true light. If certain communities do not accept his version of history, they are the bad ones. How true is his claim that Savarkar, Bose or Bhagat Singh would garner more votes than Gandhi? Why, then, do we have a party of perpetual Gandhi flashers in power?
Many ordinary Indians also admire him, as witness his presence on posters and calendars in middle-class homes across the land. Bose’s appeal is enhanced by the fact that for the bulk of his career he operated within the mainstream of, indeed at the very top of, the national movement. He was twice elected President of the Indian National Congress. That he then broke away from Gandhi and company and forged an alternative path of his own places him in a different category from Savarkar and Bhagat Singh. Well, we have Osama's picture in ordinary homes too. Our political leaders name their kids Stalin. Bose broke away from Gandhi? Come on Guha Sahib, you can do better than that. The Gandhi-Bose feud is well documented.
In nothing else have Western writers gone more wrong about Gandhi than in overlooking his insatiable love of power and implacability in its pursuit. In this he was no different than Stalin. Only, he did not have to kill because he could eliminate his opponents equally well by means of his non-violent Vaishnava method. (I need not repeat here that he was a devout Vaishnava.) A well-known Bengali tale illustrates non-violence as practiced by Vaishnavas. One day a renowned Vaishnava, who was passing near some men who were about to kill another man, their enemy, stopped in horror and cried out: 'Hold, hold! Don't kill a creature of of Krishna!. ' ' What then should we do?' asked the men. The Vaishnava replied: 'Tie him up in a sack and throw him into the river.' This according to the Vaishnavas was not killing, but the non-violent way of getting rid of enemies. This was done. In like manner, Gandhi had Bose put into a sack and thrown into a river. Bose succeeded in breaking out of the sack, but his swimming strength was insufficient for him to attain either bank of India's river of politics. He was carried downstream, out to sea, eventually to reach foreign shores - only to die. Trotsy was murdered in Mexico. Bose was killed in an air crash on Formosa. Their modes of death was different, but the end was the same; a necessity in both cases for the man in power. (reproduced from Thy Hand, Great Anarch!, Nirad C. Chaudhuri). It is quite clear that Guha is trying his very best for a national award. Any more of Nehru and Gandhi invocation (right now he averages about a dozen per passage) and he is a sure bet for next year's Padma Vibhushan. He is also showing signs of desperation. Mid-terms polls may come up. He has just released a book, the timing is just right. God forbid, if a communal party were to come to power next year.....
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 8:27 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Saturday, September 08, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
We first learned about the new NCERT Civics text for the seventh grade from an article in The Hindu. The article was ecstatic in praising this book. Apparently this book, titled Social and Political Sciences II, replaces Civics. According to the article, the book tends to avoid definitions to sum up a concept. It uses case studies and narratives instead.
During our time, Civics used to be a pretty dry subject. You had to memorize the names and functions of the pillars of democracy, i.e. the democratic institutions. You learned about your rights and duties. You also learned about the constitution.
Instead, this new book has a comicey feel to it, among other things it features images from the hit movie Deewar to illustrate the concept of dignity of labor.
This got us curious. We decided to analyze the book and find out what it is all about.
The very first thing you note about the book are the ugly black and white drawings. Through these drawings, the students are introduced to the socialist narratives. The book is chock-full of various social programs undertaken by the Congress led Government, for instance the mid-day meals (which prominent social activist Chandrabhan Prasad considers a total failure besides being a misguided populist measure).
While it is expected that a people friendly Government will try its very best to indoctrinate children in socialism, your eye doesn't really pop out until you come across this:
This friends, is the Article 15, according to this book. Note the missing three most important clauses. Now, given that this book is meant for 12-year olds, you could argue that they are not mature enough to understand the implications of the clauses (3) , (4) and (5). Unfortunately this is not the case. The students are expected to not only understand but react to this:
 The second chapter introduces the concept of universal healthcare. The usual ideas follow, for some reason Kerala and Costa Rica are presented as two model places which implement ideal healthcare policies.
The third chapter introduces the idea of state versus central Government, their roles and responsibilities and also the concept of MLAs and "opposition". There is a comic strip in which two girls are going to school when they come across a Bandh. There is a loudmouth person with an antiquated PA system who the girls identify as the "opposition" leader. The girls sneer.
The very next page elaborates on a state assembly and explains who are the rulers and who are the opposition. It is no coincidence that they pick Himachal Pradesh, pointing out that BJP is the opposition.
This is not an isolated example, the book picks several socialist success stories from Congress or Left states.
In Chapter 4, the concept of housewife is demonstrated using a Sikh family. Chapter 5 features an exercise in which students are asked to draw pictures of people employed in various professions. Then they are supposed to tabulate the number of students who drew a picture of a male or female for any given profession. Most surprisingly, the chapter also provides model answers, which is supposed to be something like - farmers all males, nurses all females etc., i.e. the students are supposed to stereotype and then be told that gender stereotypes are wrong. This is seriously funny.
Chapter 6 through 9 brings up establishment related issues. These parts deliver a strong doze of socialist economics, the communist manifesto would have been a better substitute. The book regretfully informs the students that the big media houses influence public opinion and how that is a bad thing. We recommend that as a practical exercise students take a tour of CNN-IBN.com. The book informs that advertisement spending is evil because it tilts the game in favor of the big manufacturers who spend crores on meaningless ad campaigns that add no value to society. Markets create inequality, only favoring certain parts of the value chain. Finally, in chapter 10, as a glowing example of a socialist success story, the Tawa Matsa Sangh cooperative story is narrated. This one happened during the previous Congress regime in MP.
There is a reason Civics was taught the way it used to be taught. It tells you in concrete terms where you stand in the democratic ecology of a country and indeed what those institutions are. This appalling book does a travesty of education by adding conclusions, value judgments and sometimes twisted facts and statistics.
How about these for life stories:
- The average wealth of Congress MPs is over 3 crores and this is merely what they publicly state. Meanwhile the PM criticizes CEOs for making too much dough
- Dangerous games are played with the constitution on a daily basis. Right now, several unelected members of the Left parties have gatecrashed into the parliamentary process.
- This should be a case study titled "How you can bypass the constitution". Ninth schedule anyone?
- Now that farmer suicides are causing widespread embarrassment, they are being elevated to the status of a "national crisis". Gee, where did I see that before?
- You don't have to be a citizen of this country to be a member of the parliament, as Congress MP Subba has demonstrated
- In Maharashtra, every politician has a cooperative, a sugar mill and a college.
- You don't really need a majority to grab powers, for instance Goa.
This is not the only assault on textbooks. Congress plans an ever deeper revision of the texts until they become indistinguishable from the party's election manifesto.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 10:36 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Thursday, September 06, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Congress is known to have a cavalier attitude towards issues such as national security and citizenship. Now they are embracing escaped convicts from other countries as their members.
Moni Kumar Subba, Congress MP from Tezpur in Assam, flashes his birth certificate when he is accused of being a foreigner who has faked his identity.A CNN-IBN investigation in March 2006 exposed Subba for lying about his place of birth and hiding his Nepalese identity. The birth certificate is the only document Subba has to prove his Indian citizenship, but a CNN-IBN investigation has again established that the certificate is a fake and that he is a foreign national. [link]
Subba is also suspected of being a convicted felon in Nepal. But then again, that may not be such an exclusive honor for a member of the Congress party.
This is not the only case where a person without proper citizenship holds a prominent political position.
An LJP legislator from Bihar has been asked by the Election Commission to explain her position in response to the allegation that she was not a citizen of the country. Nagina Devi, MLA from Bathnaha, received a letter from the EC asking her to be present in person on September 17 to explain her position on the allegation that she was a Nepali citizen, official sources said on Tuesday. In the event of her not turning up, it would be deemed that she had nothing to say in her defence, the letter said. [link] While we are at it, there is no harm in checking out some of the MPs and MLAs from West Bengal.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 10:42 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 Priyanka Vadera's four-bigha plus agriculture plot in downtown Shimla fills the void that makes the surroundings a VIP Enclave in the real sense of the term. [..]
"It was the best available land that we have got for the daughter of our leader Sonia Gandhi," KS Khacchi, a local Congress worker, said. "The best possible efforts would be made to ensure that the structure that comes up is unique and scenic in more ways than one," he added.
Khacchi played a key role in buying the land for around Rs 46 lakh at the Government rate. Otherwise the land would have cost much more, given the proximity of the plot to Kalyani Helipad, Kufri village [..] [link] Given that we have a surplus of social justice wallahs, farmers and locals are regularly getting the short end of the stick as far as land deals are concerned. Farmers have received abysmally low prices for their lands starting from Singur to Gurgaon. This farce continues, as Reality Check reports here.
Meanwhile, influential people continue to get land wherever they want at throwaway prices. This is a double whammy for the economy. First, the real land owners get zilch. Second, land is grabbed by people with political power who may not be the best users of the land. This land grab scam is the classic problem in socialistic economies. It is a combination of hold-up and rent seeking behavior.
The solution of course is to modify the laws to allow farmers to sell land at a price they want. The excuse that those laws protect farmers' interests is clearly no longer valid. Land is getting grabbed anyway, at least let the farmers enjoy some solid dough.
Recently, the Punjab Government took an admirable stand on land acquisition issues:
Badal said, "A company that wants to come to Punjab must buy land at market rates. The Congress government has given village and commercial land, like in Mohali. This is worth Rs 100 crore but it's been promised at Rs 2 crore. [..] We won't acquire land for anyone. Whoever needs to purchase land should do so at market prices."
"The SEZ policy is the decision of the Indian government and we are going to support it. We welcome SEZ in Punjab," Sukhbir Singh Badal said. Badal says his government has no problem with Reliance retail outlets. But he insists that the party buying the land must pay market prices. [link] This Government claims to be the protector of poor farmers. In reality, they are running a brokerage service for land grabbers and scammers.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 10:07 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Wednesday, September 05, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 Monday, 27th August 2007. Two days after the incident, Telangana Rashtra Samithi MLA Nayini Narsimha Reddy, Chief Minister Y.S. Rajashekhar Reddy, Home Minister K. Jana Reddy and Andhra Pradesh Congress Committee President Dr. K. Keshava Rao share an ROTFL moment. [via acorn]
So, how are we doing since the blast?
Most politicians interviewed after the blast said that we do not need a tough terror law. They reminded us that even when POTA was in effect, we suffered terror attacks while simultaneously emphasizing the need for quick implementation of the Sachar committee recommendations.
Apparently there were lots of warnings about a possible attack on the city. The following report may offer some clues as to why no action was taken:
Police sources told TOI that in the last six months or so, the intelligence agencies were instructed to step up vigilance on the opposition political parties, especially the Telugu Desam, the Telangana Rashtra Samithi and the Left parties. [..] According to the sources, with both general and assembly elections due in 2009, the political bosses have instructed the intelligence department to assess the political strength and poll preparedness of the TDP, TRS and the two Left parties. [link] Using Government resources for political campaign is not new in India. But this takes it to a new low (or should we say high?).
Sadly, a POTA-less regime is proving to be no less potent in its potential for human rights violations.
Levelling allegations that about 50 Muslim youth were picked up by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) in the past five days, Civil Liberties Monitoring Committee (CLMC), India, on Tuesday put out names of 22 youth who were allegedly taken into custody by police.
"They are being tortured by police in torture cells in areas like Shamshabad, Uppal and Ramanthapur. Our sources said these interrogations are being carried out in resorts and hotels,'' Civil Liberties Monitoring Committee general secretary Lateef Mohd Khan said at a press conference here on Tuesday.
Khan said riots had broken out in the Old City in 1990 due to internal differences in Congress party. "Now, the blasts could have happened because of the same reason," he alleged. [link] This clearly runs counter to the popular opinions about POTA. You see, human rights violations in a semi-fascist country like India is generally a function of political will and the need of the hour. Add a little economics and human nature. With POTA, the cops could hold the most suspicious dudes for extended periods of time. Without POTA, they must cast their nets extremely wide in the hope of finding that odd little bit of evidence. Also, under tremendous pressure, the police will be forced to not report many detainees simply because they are in violation.
POTA is one instance of BJP's shortsightedness. They should have reenacted TADA by calling it TADA-II. Think about the implications.
If all this does not make sense, don't worry about it. Just order Hyderabadi Biriyani next time you go out for dinner.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 8:15 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Tuesday, September 04, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
To paraphrase Joseph Stalin, it does not matter how many farmers commit suicide. It only matters who counts the deadbodies. Recent reports suggest that not only did the farmer package not stop suicides, they may have spurred even more deaths.
'Interestingly, the prime minister's visit along with the agriculture minister to the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra on June 30, 2006 was followed by an increase in the number of suicides in the region. Over 150 suicides occurred between July 2 and August 21,' the report says. [link]
This, in a good crop year.
Note that the Vidarbha farmer suicide issue reached a crescendo of coverage in the newspapers during the PM visit. The package was widely publicized. Perhaps a section of the media truly believed that the package would help.
We noted earlier that the marginal utility of these packages may have long been exhausted to the point that moral hazard is now kicking in.
According to a CNN-IBN report:
Farmers in the killing fields of Vidarbha live on credits and die in installments. As many as 1,338 farmer have ended their lives till date. On Friday, when Prime Minister Manmohan Singh visited the region and announced a new package, Vidharba was still grappling with the dark reality of farmer suicide.
The 3,750-crore- rupee package announced by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh for cotton farmers in Vidharba hasn't touched many lives like that of 64-year-old Bhavrao Ingole, 74-year-old Sukdev Meshram and 26-year-old Sunita Lasankute.
Bhavrao received a cheque of a paltry Rs 350, which bounced twice
"Last year, the crop got damaged due to rains and I got a cheque of Rs 350 in the name of relief. Even that bounced twice," Bhavrao Ingole claims. [link] Meanwhile, this is what our esteemed Minister of Agriculture has to say on the issue:
Union agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar said on Friday that the media were not doing justice to the issue of farmers’ suicides in Vidharbha. Briefing the press after a joint review of agriculture by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Mr. Pawar said he came to the conclusion after hearing the State government’s presentation on the package for farmers. Mr. Pawar said the State’s presentation showed there was a substantial improvement in the situation. The State government figures showed a fall in the number of suicideshe said. He, however, said he did not want to comment on the statistics in response to questions. [link]
As always, we are sternly reminded that we should abaondon stats and rely on life stories narrated by ministers instead.
Meanwhile a new visit by the PM is planned. Who knows if the new package will be of any help? If you were to believe in the Rajiv Gandhi theorem (at the most 15% of any social spending reaches the intended audience), the situation seems to be stark.
We end this series with a couple of quotes by P. Sainath (this year's Magsaysay award winner), who is perhaps the most authoritative figure on farmer related issues in India today:
Q. Is it true that the suicides went up in July this year as opposed to last year despite the PM’s visit to Vidarbha?
There are two sets of figures, one is the official set, which is very recent, shaky and not reliable, then there are the Vidarbha's Jan Andolan Samiti's figures, which are more reliable. Both confirm this.
Q. Have there been any positives at all in the government’s actions?
There was a political benefit to the PM's visit; nothing in terms of the economy. [..] To find the positives in the government's actions, you would need a microscope.
[link]
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 7:48 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Monday, September 03, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Year 1971. A feisty Indira Gandhi leads India in a war against Pakistan. The point of contention? Huge humanitarian issue in erstwhile East Pakistan. Massive rush of refugees from Bangladesh into India. War begins. Pakistan suffers a "humiliating" defeat. A new nation is born.
Year 2007. Bomb blasts in Hyderabad - first at Mecca Masjid and then at two popular joints. About 50 dead. Prime suspect: one Mr. Bilal, commander of a Bangladesh based terror group.
Throw in various issues of land encroachment, harboring Ulfa terrorists and of course massive scale smuggling, racketeering, fake notes, prostitution, slavery etc. A smattering of denial of deals to Indian companies. Not much interest in developing economic relations with India.
Meanwhile the new nation has flirted with dictatorship, religious theocracy, military Junta and all other conceivable types of Governments. Don't even talk about the current state of affairs.
Note also the deafening silence of the Indian media about the massive scale human rights violations against minorities in Bangladesh. The only vocal protester, Taslima Nasreen, currently in exile in India, is fast becoming a persona non grata.
These sort of problems arise when a country is unable to identify its citizens by a common trait. Thanks to the Brits and other colonial countries, more than two thirds of the world has become bastardized. The natural historical boundaries of nations have been destroyed. Ethno-religious groups are being forced to cohabit with incompatible groups.
Of course you can't hate them (meaning the Brits and other colonizers). Especially we can't. But for the Brits, we would have a different, perhaps much more unpleasant arrangement.
(Add your favorite cliche involving roses, glasses etc. here.)
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 12:47 AM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Sunday, September 02, 2007 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
First, a little quiz:
Which of the following states/places saw the maximum number of farmer suicides during the 2001-06 timeframe (during which time this became a major political issue)?
a) Orissa b) Kalahandi c) Andhra Pradesh d) Karnataka e) Vidarbha f) Kerala Don't spend too much time on it though, you will find the answer (and more) in this post.
Flashback to May, 2004. Chandrababu Naidu is ousted after a stint of about nine years, amid a huge national uproar on the alarming increase in farmer suicides in AP. During the final few years of his tenure, article after article, research paper after research paper claimed that the CM, in his zeal to pander to the information industry, completely neglected the Agricultural sector. Naidu's TDP is summarily defeated in May, 2004 and a people friendly Government, led by YSR Reddy is voted in.
Suicides by farmers are nothing new in AP. The issue first hit the headlines in 1987 when 20 cotton growers committed suicide. The problem assumed alarming proportions in 1997. In the last seven years, about 200 farmers have ended their lives each year. And these are conservative estimates.
During the TDP government's regime, farmers' suicides had become a regular occurrence. The Congress reckons over 3,000 farmers ended their lives under Naidu's rule. Farmers' organisations (kisan sabhas) place this figure at 1,800. Official records say 900 farmers have committed suicide since 1997. [link]
Same stat, three sets of numbers. Assuming the farmer orgs are right, this puts the TDP factor at 2 and Congress factor at 1.67 (these factors will be useful later in the analysis).
Now, let's throw in some recent data. According to a recent publication [pdf] by Social Watch India, 2,410 farmers commited suicide between 2001 and 2006 in Andhra Pradesh. Given that the average score was about 200 per year between 1997 and 2004, you can subtract about 700 from this and you arrive at a number for YSR Reddy from May, 2004 till 2006.
So, at about estimated 1,400, the YSR regime has already seen more than 1.5 times the official figure of Naidu's time. This excludes 2007, which isn't over yet! Even if you take the Congress figure of 3,000 for all seven reported years from the earlier article, YSR has scored a much better per year average so far. If you take the farmers' organization figures, YSR is going to beat Naidu by a whopping margin. You could call it an innings defeat. In one term, YSR is set to kill more farmers than Naidu did in two terms. Of course, Andhra farmers are getting killed by other more direct means by the state Government as well.
Some more stats: TDP claims 3,302 died during the YSR regime through 2006. The National Social Watch report claims 1,126 in 2004 alone. Another interesting report with a suicide density map (at the bottom). Using the TDP factor, the number 1,400 seems about right. It also matches with the independent source.
Answer to the Quiz. At 5,980 (2001-2006), Karnataka beat Andhra Pradesh by a huge margin. Here is a link to Karnataka's political history. We expect the journos to decamp from Vidabhra and move to Karnataka soon.
Final Tally (2001-06)
Karnataka (5,980) Andhra Pradesh (2,410) Maharashtra (2,280) Kerala (506) Punjab (179) Gujarat (24) Orissa (8)
Notice that some states are missing from the tally.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 5:04 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Saturday, September 01, 2007 |
|
 |