 |
|
 |
 |
Thursday, July 31, 2008 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Why CNN-IBN did not telecast trust vote sting
Why have we not telecast the story so far? Quite simply, we have chosen not to telecast the story yet because we did not feel that the story was complete. Credible journalism is based on accuracy not speed, facts not sensationalism, reportage not allegations and assumptions. Our rigorous editorial protocol demands that even a hidden camera shoot is absolutely water-tight. In this particular story, there were many loose ends that needed to be cross-checked, corroborated and investigated further before the story could be aired. [...]
We would like to reiterate that at CNN-IBN we remain committed to quality and independent journalism. Our commitment is to the truth. Truth that cannot be partial, inconclusive or sensational, but one that must adhere to exacting standards of fairness and accuracy. This is just a small excerpt from a long winded article. Since when does the media wait for a story to "complete"? At this very moment the CNN-IBN site adorns a scary newsflash about a bomb scare at Vadodara stock exchange. Exactly what could be not so water-tight about a footage from a hidden camera? Except of course if you are literally shooting under water.
The story also goes on to quote Harish Salve at length. Salve adds little value except to agree with CNN-IBN not airing the tape, while simultaneously not providing any convincing legal reason for not doing so.
Not airing the tape was a choice. Likewise, everything stated in the article are opinions of CNN-IBN team or their masters. The basic fallacy is that an opinion can not impart morality on a choice, especially when the opinion is expressed by the party making the choice.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 5:49 AM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Monday, July 28, 2008 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
So the secular buggers are yelping like kicked pariah dogs, after Sushma Swaraj gave them a taste of her own version of Dum Dum dawai. Under normal circumstances, Ms. Swaraj's statements are highly offensive and objectionable, but then again you wanna argue if these are normal circumstances? Be our guest (hint: large bundles of currency notes being flashed in Parliament, Amar Singh etc.). At least two BJP oriented blogs (Chindu and Offstumped) excoriated Ms. Swaraj's statements in no uncertain terms.
But such courtesy was not extended by the intellectual Junta post Sonia Gandhi's Maut ka Saudagar remark. Amar Singh uttered the phrase "communal forces" so many times that the fella might have developed a toothache from it.
The fact remains that the extended family has always resorted to the most vulgar rhetoric. The list of their victims is long - starting from Dr. Ambedkar to Babu Jagjivan Ram to the latest - Mayawati (a recent CNN-IBN comedy show made the most vulgar allusions to her appearance, Tehelka's Mintty Tejpal also made similar remarks in the past). Let us not even mention the most offensive remarks made about a certain set of people day in and day out. Now they are suddenly nice, working for "national interest" and ardent believers of "economic growth".
The media and the intellectuals must share at least a part of the blame for the recent dreadful attacks. The sheer scale of the attack and the meticulous planning behind it suggests the involvement of at least several dozen operatives. This would not have been possible without the aid of the media's constant flashing of terrible images and constant reopening of wounds. The Tehelka Sting finally bore its deadly fruit.
Shortly after the attacks, CNN-IBN had Mallika Sarabhai on call. She said something about humanity and insensitivity and then mentioned a couple of key incidents from 2002. Then she said, "perhaps about two hundred or three fifty or a thousand women were raped ...". Even if one were to disregard the statistics, how do you explain such casual statements?
What Mallika Sarabhai, Rajdeep Sardesai, Sagarika Ghose and countless other intellectuals want to say is that Ahmedabad deserved this attack. It is just that they don't have Sushma Swaraj's guts.
So, after dozens of attacks, lots of editorializing, politicking, indignation, discussions, analysis paralysis etc. etc., the only big question is: will they consider it even, now?
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 8:55 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Saturday, July 26, 2008 |
 |
Wednesday, July 23, 2008 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Phyllis Schlafly may not be a familiar name to many, but in her prime time during the 60s she was one of the most influential American conservative activists. Her groundbreaking book, A choice not an echo, aside from being a best seller, would essentially set the tone that would eventually usher in the Reagan era.
An outstanding student, her achievements are even more remarkable given that this was an America still not comfortable with an independent woman, let alone one with strong views.
While the political situation in the book requires some background and indeed may not be wholly applicable to a parliamentary democracy like India, many of the ideas in it will be immediately familiar.
A choice not an echo is an ardent appeal to American voters, before the presidential elections of 1964. Phyllis Schlafly exposes the ugly underbelly of the unholy influence big business wields on the political process. The book details how easily national interests are set aside, how conveniently idealistic candidates are buried by a conniving media.
An excerpt from the book readers can immediately relate to:
Chapter Six: The Pollsters and the Hoaxers (1944)
They discovered and developed a new political weapon: the Gallup Poll. Dr. George Gallup began asking lot of questions of a very few people, and - funny thing - he usually came up with answers that pleased the New York kingmakers.
The Gallup poll has been used repeatedly as a subtle propaganda machine to sell the Republicans on the false propositions that the GOP cannot win unless it (1) continues the New Deal foreign policy and (2) names candidates who will appeal to left-leaning Democrats and liberals.
The Gallup Poll worked so well that, in 1944, there was hardly any need to have a Republican Convention. The Gallup Poll had already announced that Dewey had 68 percent of Republican voters in his camp, and that he was the only Republican with a chance to win.. The Convention was cold, dull and colorless. The delegates met merely to ratify the Gallup Poll decision.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 10:31 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Tuesday, July 22, 2008 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Ah! Democracy! Strange are its ways indeed. In any case, no refund for subscribers, so, we are stuck with this for now.
As explained earlier, our objection to the N-deal is mainly on the basis of strategic reasons. The current political environment of the world is pretty toxic and uncertain. Except France, most other countries have crossed over to the liberal side. Once the Olympics are over, heaven only knows what the Chinese will do. A liberal western Government will not blink before imposing sanctions on India for real or imagnary transgressions of the treaty, if it wins a few votes on that basis. So far India has managed to stay out of the radar of the NPT wallahs. Why stir up the shit pot?
In any case, it looks like we are going to have nuke power, lots of it. This is where the N-Deal starts to look like a huge fiasco.
A 2003 MIT study reveals that Nuclear power economics is very dubious. Huge upfront costs, as much as $12 billion for a single unit, can make it even more expensive. In the US, where nuke provides 20% of power, the industry has received a subsidy of more than $100 billion. For a quick reference, please read this Salon article.
An interesting quote from a US Pundit, to people of Australia (who have massive Uranium reserves!):
"I love the idea of nuclear energy if we can ever figure out a way to make it," he said.
"It's the most catastrophically expensive way to boil a pot of water that has ever been devised, and if we can figure out a way to make it economical and safe I'm all for it."
Yes, Virginia, if oil costs go beyond a certain threshold, Nuke power may become a cheaper alternative. This is too hypothetical. No one has ever done a convincing economic study on nuke power in India. Nuke power competitiveness depends on local factors. All the Government reports generally quote arbitrary international data, with no mention of up front costs or costs of over runs and inefficiency that is almost a hallmark of Government projects. Add to it all the overheads of inspection, land acquisition, safety etc.
Soon, the US may start offshore drilling. What if oil price makes a retreat? We will be left holding expensive nuclear power in our hands.
For all the bravura of the Government, no one is going to spend $12 billion for a single unit for the type of scale they intend to achieve. As a comparison, the farmer loan waiver was $15 billion. This is also the total amount of individual income tax collected in the most recent fiscal year.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 8:37 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Sunday, July 20, 2008 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
The complete disconnect between words and deeds exhibited by the Congress party started to become apparent from the twilight years of Pandit Nehru. Until then, the great man's personal charm over the populace and political leaders managed to put an aura of artificial nobility on the party and put detractors on the back foot.
Even then, the Congress was able to maintain its charade. It was also helped by momentous historical events. However, the mask started to come off since the late 80s and by now it is completely off, revealing a face that is almost cartoonish - and ugly.
Congress has always demanded the highest conduct from its opposition and detractors, simultaneously indulging in the worst forms of political skulduggery.
Suhasini Haider's excellent post on CNN-IBN chronicles some of the party's past back stabbings.
Why has it come to this- where the UPA is in parliamentary ICU, depending on blood donations from those it has never felt the need to be even civil with in the past? Why is it that statesmanship and floor management is a dying art while pressure politics and deal making flourishes? If this vote was about the nuclear deal, one the government says as in national interest, why didn't the Prime Minister make any effort for national consensus before this? From July 2005, when the deal was announced, to July 2007, when the 1-2-3 was frozen, to July 2008, when his government may yet go on the issue, why has he not reached out to one member of the NDA, with an olive branch, not a fait accompli? And why are Mrs. Gandhi and Master Gandhi making the pitch to the nation for a "nuclear revolution" that will light up all villages now and never before? Losing the trust vote could actually help the party immensely. The general elections will coincide with the state elections in BJP states - where the wave of anti-incumbency against the state Governments will find its way into the general elections too. Inflation may continue to get worse. Also, the party can put back on the mask of nobility with the claim that they let the Government fall rather than indulge n horse trading (believe it or not, people buy these things).
Perhaps Congress is betting too much on free agent voters. They feel that these voters are so sold on the N-Deal that they will vote for the Congress in large numbers in the next general elections, completely disregarding chronic mis-governance, urban chaos, halted reforms, terror and naxal menace, cronyism and corruption.
If that is the case, it is the biggest irony of all. Most of Congress rhetoric is targeted at these free agent voters, who are allegedly constantly preventing it from implementing its social justice schemes.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 10:30 AM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Monday, July 14, 2008 |
 |
Sunday, July 13, 2008 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
The Congress party takes for granted a small but significant section of its vote bank. This is the segment that votes strictly on nostalgic factors. This is an ossified, politically non-vocal community that fasts on 2nd October. For them time stands still in the pre-independence era. Sure, there are problems, but their deliverance will eventually come. They hope for an Avatar of the Mahatma or Chachaji.
They don't even have to read the Organizer to find out just how much of a departure the party has made from their mythical world. Mythical because much of their perception was really formed by a state controlled media and a state controlled education system. They just need to see who contests from Nehru's constituency these days.
Unfortunately, this group stubbornly resists change, since the support for the party is tied to their self-image. Divested of religion and any other sense of morality, they constantly need to seek solace in the words of past leaders of the Congress party. Captive to the sound bites of a new generation of unscrupulous leaders characterized by boundless avarice, greed and gluttony, they exhibit unmistakable symptoms of Stockholm syndrome.
In Amar Singh we see a last big hope that this vote bank will finally receive the requisite jolt that can awaken them from their stupor. What was until now confined to the dust plains of primitive UP, can potentially come to the political center-stage. Once it does, it ain't gonna be pretty.
We already talked about startling facets of the man's persona. Well, here is more.
A reader alerted us about a phone-tapping scandal involving Amar Singh that happened in 2006. Apparently some opportunistic elements (at the time Amar Singh alleged even Congress and indeed the party was most vocal in demanding Singh's arrest) tapped Amar Singh's phone and recorded several conversations, not only with industrialists but with Bollywood actresses. Some of these conversations were incriminating in nature and referred to ongoing court cases against the politician. Funny thing is, the media never broadcast these tapes. They developed cold feet and allowed Singh enough time to get a Supreme court stay order.
Here is an interesting bit from the tapes (allegedly a conversation between Amar Singh and actress Bipasha Basu):
Amar: : But I will make some time. Bipasha: : OK sweetie. Amar: : Very nice of you to have remembered me. Bipasha: : (Laughs) I toh always remember you. Amar: : An old man like me. Bipasha: : Sorry. Amar: : An old fossil like me. Bipasha: : Old fossil like you. Amar: : ya ya. Bipasha: : I don't think age really matters. Does it? Amar: : It matters between the legs na? Bipasha: : (Bursts out laughing) Oh God.ha ha ha ha.all right then.you try removing time now. it's been almost a month now I've not met. Amar: : Ya we will meet. Bipasha: : OK. Right, keep in touch. Bye. Bit too much information on the effects of aging on his anatomical parts.
CNN-IBN's Rajdeep Sardesai writes:
As our camera recorded the private party , I asked Amar Singh how he reconciled the role of neta by day and party animal by night: "I am not a hypocrite," he shot back, with a familiar grin, "If Amitabh and Anil Ambani are my friends, why should I hide it from the world? If I play Holi with Shilpa Shetty, why should I be ashamed of it!" [link]
Certainly there is nothing wrong in social interactions, but it is a bit disconcerting that various references to Bollywood female stars is almost like a central theme to the man's character. No wonder he is siding heavily with Anil Ambani, who has recently made huge investments into the entertainment business.
Perhaps Rajdeep finds it cutesy, we are not so amused. Amar Singh's proximity to industrialists was described by Rajdeep Sardesai as a likely new chapter in Indian history, a bridge between corporate India and politics. When BJP leaders drop any hint of capitalistic reforms, the usual response is putting up a front page story with a picture of a hungry child. Such is the nature of political discourse in the country today.
Scarcely a few days into the new alliance, Amar Singh has already made contemptuous statements about a Supreme Court judge (or as Ramachandra Guha would say, started fixing institutions one by one).
We just hope that Congress realizes the risk in letting these elements into its sanctum sanctorum.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 10:45 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Thursday, July 10, 2008 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
New rabbits are being pulled out of the hat every day. Now we have been informed that there are certain safeguards that must be kept secret. In other words, no one really has a clue. It is not even clear if they let various opposition leaders take a peep at those supposedly extremely sensitive documents.
But it is the red herring being dragged across the trail and not those rabbits that interests us. Here is a wild conspiracy theory and it sure does sound a lot more interesting than the copious amount of analysis being done on all the news channels.
How about the Left, SP and the Congress were in on it together in a well thought out plan?
- Even as Prakash Karat seethes in uncontrollable fits of anger, A B Bardhan has virtually admitted that no love has been lost between the Left and the UPA.
- If the Congress wanted the deal so badly at the risk of early polls, it could have done so last year. The proverbial iron was hot, it would be a game, set and match in a matter of months. All they gained is about a year worth of extra tenure.
- In contrast, right now the deal really has little chance of going through.
- Left could not abandon their ideological position at any point of time. They would have opposed the deal anyway. Last year was a genuine attempt to make the deal, Congress hoped against hope that the Left might come to a compromise formula - such as CMP+ for N-Deal. This negotiation failed.
- Manmohan Singh's image has suffered a setback. The prince is waiting on the bench. Congress needs a strong excuse to flag in the prince, yet weather the ensuing criticisms. Congress also needs to revive the Nehru-Gandhi brand. Manmohan Singh gets to keep the congratulations for posterity.
- How about Congress is helpless, like they always are? Suppose the Left demands Manmohan Singh's ouster? Well, A B Bardhan already did.
- Now suppose the Samajwadi Party demands Rahul Gandhi be made the PM candidate? Right now they are perched on a fairly high branch of the morality tree - Amar Singh has declared that they won't demand a ministerial berth. He is using the phrase "communal forces" in every other statement. In such a setting, the whole thing will not only sound natural, but even the media will have plenty of ammunition when they face the nation.
- For the Left, it does not really matter. They get to keep their ideological stand intact. Deal or no deal, they have saved face in front of their core support base of leftist intellectuals and minorities. The non minority poor that supports the Left are indifferent to the deal.
- The Left could not possibly join an NDA alliance. They worked out a nice formula with UPA. So, by diverting focus on the scape goat Manmohan Singh, they can participate in the next UPA Government without embarrassment. This will work even if they lose some seats in the next elections.
- An SP and Congress alliance in UP can not get much worse than them fighting each other. On the other hand they have a much greater upside from their low seat counts. For SP it may mean a chance to participate in the Government in the near future. This could be the only way they can elbow in, the UNPA is all but dead.
- Cases against Mayawati are suddenly being fast tracked while those against Amar Singh and Mulayam Singh Yadav are being shelved.
- The next elections can become a numbers game. Abhishek Singhvi has already stated that he believes that the largest alliance should form the Government, not necessarily the party that wins the most seats.
- Inflation is likely to get worse. The constitutional "crisis" is a nice diversionary tactic and a good excuse to bail out before the inflation issue goes completely out of hand.
There are too many coincidences and too many startling developments in this whole drama. News channels like CNN-IBN are playing a bit too dumb to be credible. There is a strong possibility that the whole thing was orchestrated. As a matter of fact, perhaps it was scripted last year itself, down to the last detail. Even last year there were plenty of hints of an SP-Cong alliance which was downplayed.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 11:45 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Ramanand, 72, and his wife Vaishno Devi killed themselves in their house in the Nagrota migrant camp. The couple had left Kashmir in 1989 and been living in their one-room house for the last 19 years. "He (Ramanand) had come from Srinagar and told me that his land was encroached upon by neighbours and a tehsildar. He said a school had been built there," Ramanand's friend, Moti Lal Bhat, said. "He wasn't given any compensation for the land. He had been fighting for it for several years and was extremely frustrated." [...] Such instances of land encroachment are not the first for Kashmiri migrants. [link] The "communal forces" must be defeated. That is the only priority, remember that.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 11:40 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Right at this very moment, Amar Singh is the secular media's blue eyed boy. He is in great demand and he is making use of it. He has been on the most important TV programs, including Devil's Advocate.
The media can't seem to get enough of Amar Singh explaining with a straight face how noble his intentions are and how committed he is in fighting the "communal forces". But he had to go out and make this highly offensive statement:
Justifying his party's decision to join hands with the Congress after years-long bitter rivalry, Amar Singh said in the interview: 'When Prakash Karat goes to meet Sonia Gandhi, it's called 'suhaag raat' [wedding night], but when we go to meet Sonia Gandhi, it's called 'balaatkaar' [rape].' Criticising the remarks, Sudha Sundararaman of the All India Democratic Women's Association (AIDWA), said Amar Singh's remarks were a reflection of the lack of respect for women in public life. [link]
The statement stinks of clogged gutters of a mufassil town in UP, where corrugated cowshed roofs silhouette the horizon.
Amar Singh hasn't forgotten the insult meted out to him by Mrs. Gandhi. That offensive statement was a deliberate act of insult, to show exactly how he is viewing this alliance and more importantly how vulnerable he thinks Congress is. Although he is denying it now, he made it on record, in front of several reporters.
There was something bizarre when he named his new house "Aishwarya". His latest offensive statement only confirms the sort of fantasy he wants to live in.
Yet his statement will be downplayed, denied and then pinned on unnamed conspirators who want to "create differences among secular forces".
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 12:08 AM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Tuesday, July 08, 2008 |
 |
Monday, July 07, 2008 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Last year, Narendra Modi made his appearance on the famed Devil's Advocate show. Faced with a persistent Karan Thapar, Modi walked out, barely a few minutes into the program. As expected, there were howls of derisive laughter from the secular quarters and much scorn for the CM from the intellectuals.
The premise of Devil's Advocate is simple: the politician or personality invited on the program is expected to face hardball questions from the host. The host (Mr. Thapar) is expected to ask big issue questions and be really persistent. For the guest, it is really a gamble. If you agree to appear on Devil's Advocate, you run the risk of being made fun of in front of the whole nation. On the other hand, your oratory can win you applause from your fans.
In other words, by agreeing to appear on the program, you are making a risk-reward calculation. It is entirely the prerogative of the personality whether he or she accepts the invitation. Likewise, the public depends on the honesty of the news channel and the host to draw conclusions about the performance of the guest.
In his characteristic style, the FM wanted to have his cake and eat it too:
Disclaimer: As a condition for granting this interview, Finance Minister P Chidambaram demanded the right to clear it as well as deny clearance without citing reasons. CNN-IBN was forced to agree otherwise the interview would not have happened. But the final take is being broadcast exactly as recorded and the Finance Minister did not ask for any change.
Karan Thapar: Hello and welcome to Devil’s Advocate. Will the Finance Minister be able to control inflation or will it sink the UPA Government? That’s the key issue I shall explore today with the Finance Minister P Chidambaram himself. [link]
Given such a strange "precondition", it is difficult not to speculate whether the entire interview was scripted.
Such is the fate of the Indian public that they must put up with such farce, such gross intellectual dishonesty. It is bad reality TV - and most people can't even afford a bag of chips.
People are starving. What does the FM expect us to do? Clap at his repartees and get overwhelmed by his courage to face the toughest TV interview in India?
Lastly, here is a curious portion of the interview:
P Chidambaram: Well when we do it we take flak, and when we cannot do it anymore because of political compulsions, we just have to grin and bear it. But we have to communicate it to the people, that India and any other developing country, which is an oil consumer, is a victim of international crude oil prices. We must communicate in the language of the people.
Karan Thapar: And that communication has to start with you and the Prime Minister because you are the two people responsible for that message?
P Chidambaram: I'm the one who's making every effort to communicate via statements, interviews, speeches but I do it in English or Tamil. There are others who have to do it in other languages too.
Karan Thapar: Someone needs to do it in the national language, which is Hindi.
P Chidambaram: Not just Hindi but Bengali, Malayalam, Oriya, Telugu — all the languages.
A fine example of signaling.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 12:06 AM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Sunday, July 06, 2008 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
We are yet to recover from Vasundhara Raje's new quota regime in which she promised 14% quota for the economically disadvantaged sections of the deemed "privileged". If this gambit passes legal challenges, Raje will beat Lalu and Mayawati to the punch.
Now get a load of this:
Two years after a city college allowed girl students inside its portals, insecurity seems to have set in male ranks. Outdone in all fields academic, they are now demanding admission under reservation. Imagine. This happening in a male-crazed land where sex ratio is anything but in favour of the female child!
On Saturday, a group of boys from SCD Government College for Boys, Ludhiana, demanded that the entry of girls in the institute be restricted. They submitted copies of their "application" to the chief minister, education minister, deputy commissioner, principal and Punjab State Human Rights Commission. They have demanded that the college authorities come out with two different merit lists in courses where girls are allowed and that seats be reserved in 70:30 (male, female) ratio. [link] There are only two remaining bastions to be conquered. The first of course is private jobs and the second - regional quota. The regional quota is currently implemented in indirect ways, for instance this.
As various groups begin to understand better where they stand, they will demand continual adjustments. Since the Government steadfastly refuse to create a poll-neutral formula and the apex court has ruled out meddling in the affairs of the executive branch, these corrections will take increasingly violent forms. The Gujjar agitation was merely one of many to come.
An example of just how messy the quota arithmetic has become can be evidenced from this:
CHENNAI: In an ironical development, a community that was provided reservation in educational institutions and jobs said it does not want the provision. Christians in Tamil Nadu said the 3.5% exclusive reservation made for them in education and employment should be abrogated, contending that they had realised that quota hurt their interests instead of benefiting them. [...] Bishop of Kottar Rev Peter Remigius, state minorities commission chairman Fr Vincent Chinnadurai, all MLAs and one MP from Kanyakumari district, were part of the delegation. "This reservation is not beneficial to the Christian community, as we were doing better when we were competing with other backward classes for 30% OBC reservation. As an educated community, we were doing well, but the quota now restricts our job opportunities and admissions," Fr Chinnadurai told TOI. [...] Citing an example, he said in the ongoing MBBS admission process, out of 2,699 seats, Christians could only get 94 seats (3.5%), whereas they could have got more than 300 seats if the entire 30% OBC quota was open to them. [link]
This is India, where there are no rules, just rights.
Reservation IIT IIM OBC SC ST Quota Arjun Singh Creamy Layer Merit JEE Mandal Commission
Arpita Majumdar lathicharge medical strike nanopolitan Abinandanan Barbarianindian The Other India Affirmative Action
posted by barbarindian at 12:54 PM Permalink

|  |
 |
 |
 |
Saturday, July 05, 2008 |
 |
Wednesday, July 02, 2008 |
|
 |