
Hallelujah! Yet another pithy editorial
post from the Head Stinger.
Mr. Tejpal's peripheral vision is now so weak that he can barely see anything even slightly off to the side. We recommend a visit to the oculist.
So, let's take a deeper look at his latest column. He has lost none of his journalistic flair, although while covering an art related incident, he appears to have been afflicted by the same sort of liberties that artists and poets are known to take from time to time.
For instance this paragraph:
In Vadodara, in one of the finest art schools in India, a gifted boy (1) from humble origins (2) has been humiliated and arraigned for artistic expression that would not raise an antagonistic eyebrow (3) in most of (4) the world’s liberal (5) democracies.
Contrast this with the following description from a
TOI article:
Who is Chandramohan Srilamantula? Is he such a famous artist that the entire art community is staging protests against his arrest? Actually, Chandramohan is only 23 and still a student, and it is his project work that’s made an impact far beyond his wildest imagination.
To summarize our analysis of just that one paragraph:
- Presumptuous. He is a student, no one said anything about him being gifted. Unless Tehelka Art Foundation gives him a scholarship, he will likely drop out and join a BPO.
- Sounds suspiciously like an attempt to give an inclusive growth type angle to it. Also, his humble origins remain unverified. Humble compared to who, Dilip D'Souza?
- Too far fetched. There are potentially 12 billion eyebrows in the world.
- A count would definitely help. Let's see: US, UK, France, Denmark, ... wait!
- A new word imported by none other than our typist friend. Blogosphere buzz indicates this is going to stick. I guess the secular catch phrase is going out of style.
Moving on from here:
As for India, it is full of idle troublemakers. It’s the State’s job to tell them where to draw the line.
The first part of the above sentence definitely has a grain of truth in it, the so called
liberal democracies where eyebrows are not raised tend to be rich nations. But look how he queers his own pitch in the very next sentence. Perhaps the Stinger does not realize that it is the very state that arrested Chandramohan. The same state that banned Rushdie, the same state that sued Khushboo and the same state that has an arrest warrant out against M.F. Hussain and the Dera chief. Let's not even talk about how a TV channel got banned because it was considering airing an obscene show during daytime.
We are not a theocracy, a dictatorship, or an autocracy. We were born out of the pyre of colonialism as a liberal democracy, and we have to bear its pride and price.
Whatever definition floats your boat dude. As far as we are concerned, India became a theocracy the day it adopted differential civil code. It's fate was sealed with the Shah Bano judgement. Also, do we really want split hairs about autocracy? Any comments on the latest cabinet restructuring?
Artistic endeavour, free expression, the pushing of boundaries are all unique attributes of a free society. The dominance of the West - science, tech, medicine - has often ensued from the creative energies that are sparked in a free environment.
Actually
free is perhaps a necessary condition but not a sufficient one. Empty stomach can create
We shall overcome, just about that. If you want to spark true creativity, nothing works better than the sound of a loudly ringing cash register. Sad but true, it's human nature and artists are humans too.
But what is it about Gujarat that allows these intolerances to flourish? Why has a community long known for its gentle, pacifist ways - with or without Mohandas - become so violent? Why has a community known for its mercantile skills become so rabidly religious?
Like we said, a visit to the oculist will clear this confusion. Alternately you can read the previous post (and the comments) of this humble blogger.
Actually, we are worried about the future of our democratic republic too. If all our intellectuals remain obsessed with Modi and Gujarat and electioneering, what will happen to the promise of India? Will our 200 million destitute and 500 million under $2 a day citizens forever languish in the blind spot of our myopic leaders and opinion makers?
Kanch is indeed OBC but is also Dalit in a political sense to the extent that he talks of 'Dalitisation of society'. of OBCs following Dalits in the AMbedkarite path. He has been described, therefore, as a "Dalit-Bhaujan scholar". I implied that he is Dalit, at the very least, in the sense that the media does.