Blogger returns, yarns spun

Readers might recall that Dilip D'Souza bid goodbye to the blogosphere a while ago. I was quite certain he would come back and that it was a cheapshot attempt at attracting attention much in the manner of our politicians when they resign, protest and stage dharnas. If Dilip had expected that there would be scores of readers pleading him to come back, it didn't quite happen. The thread of the goodbye post ended up being a slugfest with Shivam Vij doing much of the cursing using different handles.

Anyway.

As expected Dilip did come back, with a bang so to speak because he has focused his attention on the so many bombings and explosions prepetrated by Islamic terrorists in India. He is spinning yarns with a zeal not seen in his pre-self-exiled avatar. For instance, in this post he links an alleged act of violence perpetrated by BJP affiliated student unions with the issue of singing Vande Mataram. In the same post he claims that this was the worst incident ever involving student union leaders. Needless to say, he does not support his premise with facts.

His latest posts mention his disillusionment at the Pope's recent remarks and the surrounding controvery. This is strange because for a man who so vociferously claims to be secular, it is quite perplexing that he could ever have been illusioned by religion in the first place.

Tragically for Dilip, the recent turn of events have summarily squashed his hopes that the Mosque attacks were the work of Vajrang Dal. The recent revelation about the long-term planning of the 7/11 bombings also shatters the myth that they were an aftermath of Gujarat riots.

The conspiracy behind the 7/11 blasts was hatched over five years ago in 2000-2001, when some of the accused in the blasts visited Pakistan-occupied-Kashmir to undergo training with the who's who of the world of terror.

The operational work was taken care of by the Pakistan-based terrorist outfit Lashkar-e-Toiba while funds and the crucial training given to the culprits came from the al-Qaeda, clearly underlining the spread of global terror.

So, while Dilip continues to spin his yarns, they appear to be a lot weaker than before.

Can you tell the difference?

The most worrying trends in the recent times may be the nexus between Islamic terrorists and communists. We already know of the nexus between LeT and Naxalites. Well, the similarities don't end there. Both indulge in large scale propaganda, often involving unsuspecting do-gooders or chronic anti-nationals with an agenda.

As far as the fake currency racket is concerned, it is by far dominated by ISI supported outfits. The reach and scale of this racket is astonishing and needless to say, several of our leaders are on the take. Needless to say, communists are well versed in this game.

It is no surprise that much of India's underworld is dominated by Muslims. It starts from the Bombay mafia, Bollywood film financing and reaches its zenith (or nadir, depending on your point of view) in the Abdul Karim Telgi stamp scam, Bangalore BPO fraud by LeT operatives etc. India remains for the Muslim world a land of heathens, to be conquered by hook or crook. Osama and Dawood are celebrated heroes in the various Muslim ghettos. The Shahi Imam issues statements to the effect that India will be once again taken by Muslims on a regular basis.

So next time you pop out a crisp 500 Rupee bill, reflect on it for a second.

Abi discovers Sweden

No one was as thrilled to discover a country since Columbus discovered Amerca. Ever since the collapse of the Soviet Union, comminists have had trouble finding fairy tales of happy commie kids singing lores of equality and "freedom". For a while China sufficed, but soon detractors called the bluff. Not only about half of China live in dire straits, the rest are essentially progressing because of a test tube version of capitalism. Strikes are a big weapon in the commie arsenal, except when they run the country, in which case they are banned. Dissenters are thrown into cages of wild animals. Ok, I made that one up.

Quite expectedly the desi commie community are looking elsewhere. Their recent discoveries include Chile and Sweden.

Abi writes:

Of course, its ideology makes the Economist try very hard indeed to trash this model. However, if you read between the lines (and you don't really have to try that hard!), it's quite clear that the choices facing the Swedish people are between different versions of the Welfare State; the Swedish model is in no danger of being dismantled.

We have been urging Abi to stick to what he knows best, i.e. materials science, because venturing into the murky territory of economics has its dangers. We are unsure whether it is plain ignorance or a propensity to spin propaganda which made Abi ignore large portions of the said article from the economist magazine. Because the portions Abi chose to ignore contain some serious indictment to Sweden's welfare statism.

Some examples (requires subscription):

In truth, the Swedish economy's best years are long gone. Between 1870 and 1950, average growth in Swedish GDP and productivity was, by some measures, the fastest in the world. In 1970 Sweden was the fourth-richest member of the OECDclub of industrial countries. But for most of the past 50 years the story has been one of relative decline, including a deep recession in the early 1990s (see chart 1).

Also:

Where will all this leave the much-trumpeted Swedish model? Most Swedes are weary of listening to foreign claims about the perfection of their society. Mr Lindbeck suggests that, where it does have economic strengths, they are of an essentially Anglo-American, market variety. Johnny Munkhammar, who runs a pro-market think-tank, Timbro, argues similarly that history shows Sweden's economy to have flourished when it has been more liberal and low-tax—and to have gone off the rails when higher taxes and more regulation have been imposed.

The version of Sweden the great welfare state that Abi conjures up (complete with socialism and Swedish blondes on the arms of materials science professors) resides only in his mind. Welfare in that context merely means job security and health and retirement benefits. In India of course it means complete blockage of anyone's ability to carry out economic activities. Sweden is decades away in terms of economic freedom and openness to global trade (remember Bofors?) and with ministers like Kamal Nath and PC seems to be basically out of reach.

Anniversaries all year round

Within days after the Russian city of Beslan remembered the massacre of school children and as the US prepares to remember the 9/11 victims, Islamic terror struck once again.

This time though, the public has rejected the overtures of politicians. As they say - you can fool some people some of the time etc. etc.

Looks like pretty soon we will have a terror attack to remember each day of the year. We can even come up with a new terror calendar. Something like, the month of Beslan, day of Malegaon bombings etc. Meanwhile, Dilip D'Souza claims that the residue found at the blast site is not RDX but his groin dust.

The only resolution of the Bombay/Malegaon bombings we have so far is as follows:

Following each terror attack, if you don't run out and hug a muslim, you are likely to be a Hindu fascist.

The "socialists" are doing pretty well for themselves - Part II

Abdul Karim Telgi, the main accused in the multi-crore fake stamp paper scandal, has named Union Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar during investigation. Telgi also accused former deputy chief minister of Maharashtra Chhagan Bhujbal and former Karnataka minister Roshan Baig of involvement in the scam.






Meanwhile, the daughter hasn't done badly for herself either.

The affidavit filed by NCP chief Sharad Pawar's daughter Supriya Sule for Rajya Sabha elections shows her to be one of the richest politicians in the state. Sule, her husband Sadanand and their two children, have properties worth a whopping Rs 41.52 crore.

(......) Mataram

What would our man say?

Noted Shia scholar and All India Muslim Personal Law Board vice-president Maulana Kalbe Sadiq on Tuesday tried to explore a midpath between national pride and religion, when he tried to delve deeper into the actual meaning of the word 'Vande'. "Does it mean salutation or worship?" he asked, adding that Muslims should have no problem if the word means 'saluting or paying respect to the country'.

In a country where women belonging to a certain religion are forced to accept polygamy by law, the Vande Mataram controversy is a non-issue. The biggest champions of human rights such as this and this never pick up stories such as this.

If you are a privileged Hindu, you had better keep your head down and wait for the sword. You are already doomed.

Submission

Read more here.

The "socialists" are doing pretty well for themselves

Our Hon'ble Minister for Health and Family Welfare Dr. Ramadoss is well known for his crusade against health hazards such as Cola drinks and cigarettes. Pretty soon you will not see any film star smoking on screen, unless the image is pixelated. Not only did Ramadoss take stern measures towards banning cigarette and cola ads, he has spoken out against Cola based drinks several times.

"Sportspersons and Bollywood stars are icons. They should not take advertisement assignments for soft drink companies like Coke and Pepsi since these drinks are detrimental to the health of children," he (Dr. Ramadoss) said.

Naming celebrities like Sachin Tendulkar, Virender Sehwag, Aamir Khan, Shah Rukh Khan and Aishwarya Rai, he said they must desist from promoting "Coke and Pepsi" if they wanted to do some good for society. (11th June, 2006)

Please note the date of the above article.

A few weeks ago, chemical tests conducted by the Centre for Science and Environment found above acceptable levels of toxic pesticides in Cola drinks.

Close on the heels of a major health scare on finding pesticides in bottled drinking water, a non-government organisation on Tuesday claimed that the bottled soft drinks owned by two multi national companies -- PepsiCo and Coke -- also failed the same health standards testing positive for pesticides.

According to the tests conducted by the Pollution Monitoring Laboratory of CSE, all samples contained residues of four extremely toxic pesticides and insecticides: lindane, DDT, malathion and chlorpyrifos. (5th August, 2006)

Bloggers went to town on this report. Needless to say, most people were appalled by the obvious double standards and questioned the rationality behind the contemplated ban of Cola drinks. Quite naturally, communists picked up the story as well and spinned it as an evil capitalistic conspiracy to poison hapless poor Indians. For instance, read the post by this moron, better still read through the comments as well.

So, does this mean no more Cola for you? No worries. The good Doctor Ramadoss has just given a clean chit to Colas. Not only that, he has expressed severe doubts about the methodology followed by the agency.

Health Minister A Ramadoss constituted the committee on August 4 to examine "the methodology of sampling, methodology of testing and validity as well as the consistency of results derived by CSE in its report."

As far as we can tell, the committee has just been formed. It will take a while to go through the documentation and conduct further tests. However, Dr. Ramadoss has no doubts in his mind, just like he has none as far as the OBC reservation goes. Our socialist Gods are beyond question and their actions beyond all scrutiny.

The folks of CSE however are not amused:

I am not at all surprised. It is a clumsy attempt of the Government to give a clean chit to the cola companies...Let us be very curt, it is not the Government speaking, it was Coca-Cola speaking - Director of CSE, Sunita Narain.

In case you are wondering, what made Dr. Ramadoss make a U-Turn on his stand and suddenly start squarely batting for the evil capitalists, we are a little confused too. This was a perfect opporunity for him to push for banning Cola based drinks, especially since he so sincerely believes they harm little children.

I guess we will just let it go at that. We suggest you do that too and enjoy Coca Cola.

Does Professor Gupta need his "Johnson"?

Okay, as our esteemed readers might be aware, the OBC quota thingy is nearing its end-game phase. There is a heck of a dogfight going on regarding who should claim credit for it. Strangely the media is totally mum about the creamy layer aspect and we are guessing it will not be excluded. For more updates on recent developments surrounding these issues, please refer to our good friend, blogger RealityCheck.

About the sixteen-thou-crore dumping on expanding the capacity of the affected institutes - we are still sceptical. We noted that some folks have already swallowed the OBC reservations as a given and at this point hoping that these monies will be at least spent towards infrastructure upgrade. Alas! As our past experience indicates with "development" projects, at least 70% of these monies will go towards enrichment of well connected contractors (read families and friends of Arjun Singh, Ramadoss, Meira Kumar, PC etc.).

So, how will the capacity expansion take place? Glad you asked.

Senior faculty member Ramesh Gupta has said in a published working paper that IIM-A can accommodate 150 additional students and continue being the academic leader even with existing faculty and infrastructure.

The paper adds that even the present hostels are enough. Of 26 student dormitories, two dormitories have been set aside for cultural events and can house 60 students. Also, there is no justification for offering 'married accommodation' for one-year executives' programme. If let out to PGP students, 100 more students can be accommodated.

Yes, it is back to the Nalanda days. Why do students need family lives or even sex? How about cultural events? Aren't they supposed to exercise strict Brahmacharya and keep their noses buried in books?

This reminded us about a comic scene from the cult movie Big Lebowski (not the scene pictured above). The protagonist (The Dude) narrates to his friends that a group of nihilists threatened to relieve him of his manhood.

The Dude: Fuck sympathy! I don't need your fuckin' sympathy, man, I need my fucking johnson!
Donny: What do you need that for, Dude?

We are wondering about that too. I am guessing professor Gupta must be in his middle age. He has already done with his procreation activities. He wonders aloud why do married executives need family accommodations. Does he need his "Johnson" at this point? Would an OBC doctor please detach the totally useless item from his esteemed body?

Brainwashing Cong Style: Catch 'em young

Remember the huge uproar surrounding the inclusion of certain personalities in the educational textbooks during the NDA regime?

Lok Manya Tilak as a militant national and Subhash Chandra Bose as a terrorist, that's not all, sexual innuendos, voyeurism and an ode to naxal poetry, that's what makes up the syllabus for students now.

Published by National Council for Educational Research and Training (NCERT) this year, these textbooks will be read by students form class I to class XI. And for once politicians across party lines rose together in protest.

Now, I am unable to decide which is more atrocious, calling Lokmanya Tilak a militant, branding Netaji a terrorist or singing odes to the Naxals? (I am assuming exposing children to sexual stuff and innundoes in the name of "art" is ok since an IAS officer declared it so). Of course these are rhetorics and pale in comparison to the clear and present danger posed by the huge fan base of Osama Bin Laden in India.

Now. let us see if Netaji deserved the title of terrorist. For the sake of argument, we will assume the line of logic that one man's freedom fighter is always another man's terrorist. For instance, the recent Bombay bombings were acts of vengeance by fighters for minority rights, at least according to some eminent bloggers. Basically, let's just take out the moral element out of it altogether. After this the whole thing gets reduced to a few technicalities which show that:

Netaji:

1. duly formed an army and declared war by accepted conventions
2. fought battles against armed forces
3. didn't carry out deliberate civilian casualties
4. was open to bi-partisan talks and infact did participate in talks with other nations
5. was fighting for a political region he could claim as his own by birth
6. had credible reason to believe that the "occupants" were denying his ilk political freedom

I encourage readers to point out mistakes in my above assumptions. Doesn't sound like a terrorist to me.

How long before they brand Swamiji a Hindu fascist in text books?

Happy Independence Day

Hope by the time you grow up, you will be truly free. Free from the clutches of the communists, the propaganda of the socialists, the violence of religious zealots, ideological impurities such as reservations, political correctness, entitlement mentality ....

Most importantly, free to be able to wave your flag and proudly claim your identity.

Rhapsody in August

You woke up one morning and sneezed. A simple cold. But for you, a life changing event. You are not to go to school that day. You are a school boy in Nagasaki, Japan, the fated day is August 9, 1945. Later in the day, at around 11:00 am, "fat man" would be dropped on your city. All your classmates would get evaporated. Instantly.

Thereafter, every year, on 9th August, you would make a pilgrimage to your old school yard. There would be others too. You would stand in circles around a small memorial, place flowers around it. Every year, till the day you die.

Rhapsody in August is a lesser known Kurosawa film. It is relatively recent, released in 1991. The plot is simple. Four grandchildren visit their grandmother in the outskirts of Nagasaki. The parents of two of them are visiting the US and apparently found the long lost brother of Grandma.

Grandma had lost her husband in the bombings (he was a school teacher in the above mentioned school). She is still ambivalent about America. She is still in pain and she still misses Grandpa.

Would her feelings change when her half American nephew (played by Richard Gere) visits her?

Kurosawa presents a heartwrenching tale of loss, redemption and forgiveness in this gritty film. In one of the most memorable scenes, the grandchildren are walking around statuettes in the memorial park. Each statue is from a different country. They read out the names of the countries. The youngest asks, where is the statue from the US? He is quickly reminded by the others, there is none from the US.

Indeed the Japanese moved on and made the most remarkable success story of the 20th Century. Today they are the second biggest economy.

Fast forward about 60 years. Think about Iraq. It is astonishing what a stark contrast that country makes. Indeed one can not help but wonder, what if we were to gain our independence in today's fractious political environment? What would the likes of Chidambaram, Ramadoss, Meira Kumar, Laloo etc. do?

Wanna play the game of reservation chicken?

Remember the dogfight between various factions over who wanted credit for the OBC quotas? Well, the game has barely even begun.

Divisions within the UPA on reservation for OBCs seem to be widening by the day. After last week's acrimony among senior ministers on quotas comes the latest salvo from DMK chief M Karunanidhi, asking Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to "respect and respond to the people's mandate by immediately extending reservation to OBCs at all levels and in all institutions under the government of India without any dilution".

"It is strange that the creamy layer concept was not applied to the unreserved category till date...these demands are entirely unconstitutional and unethical"
- Karunanidhi

Strange indeed. At this point it is difficult to speculate who will have the last laugh in this game of reservation chicken.

Voice of the underprivileged muffled by totalitarian regime

The pro-quota folks often thump their chests by equating the numerical strength of the potential quota beneficiaries to democracy. In reality however, the quota benefits are cornered by a privileged few.

The same goes for dalit representation in the media and politics. Do the likes of Kancha Ilaiah, Udit Raj represent the truly oppressed? Don't think so. Same goes for the OBC leadership. These folks claim that the quotas are a triumph of the democratic process. Here is a thought, let's say we take to referendum the best way to disburse the Rs. 16,000 crores (quota cost). What do you think will win? Bags of rice for millions of poor or seats for a few thousand rich OBCs?

Raghav Mahto, the 21-year-old who owns the FM Mansoorpur radio station in Bihar that was shut down a few months ago, has now received an award for his achievement.

And from the small shop Raghav used to run the radio station that broadcasted music and social messages to villages within a 15-kilometre radius.

However, the state government shut down the radio station for running without a license.

This is expected. Raghav probably didn't pander to any political party. All he did was brighten up the lives of folks who will never see any benefits of our welfare largesse. If the quotas are not reaching enterprising folks like Raghav in large portions, they are basically useless.

Read more at the excellent Reality Check blog, here.

Abismal

Who is in charge of The Other Idiots site these days? Possibly not Dilip since he apparently bid goodbye to the blogosphere (speculation is rife why he did that - some claim that he had a spate with Shivam since the latter stole the thunder following the blog bans and published not one but two articles on Rediff, thus getting himself quite a bit of fan following). Can we have some quality control there please? It is alright to rant on your personal blog, not on a collaborative blog ostensibly set up for the very important task of highlighting the plight of the other half.

Here is what Abi writes in his recent post:

I didn't plan to attend the talk, as I wasn't keen on spending the evening before the Varalakshmi Vratam ("undertaken by the sumangalis for ... [among other things, a] long life for the husbands") by sitting through a diatribe against reservation; however, a friend challenged me by calling me a 'conservative' liberal (i.e., a liberal with a closed mind) who's unwilling to listen to opposing viewpoints. Just to show him that my mind was not closed (yet), I chose to go to the talk.

Here is a clue professor, keep your rants and personal life to your personal blog. If you must take on someone of the stature of Arun Shourie, you would sound a lot more credible if you didn't appear like you are desperately trying to untie the numerous knots in your knickers.

Needless to say Abi is still not convinced how reservations mess with equality. For a person who blogs 24/7 on the reservation issue, he is rather clueless about what happens in reality. For instance, he was shocked to discover that there could be creamy layer problem for Dalits!

The holes he points out in Shourie's talk are full of banalities and contradictions. For instance:

Shourie clearly puts growth on a pedestal. Many others take this view, too, and I won't argue with them, except to point out that there are many who wouldn't mind a (slightly) smaller growth if it is accompanied by a more broadbased (and more than proportionate increase in) social welfare.

Then on the issue of more support at the primary level he mocks Shourie:

Well, if loathing the policy of reservations pushes a person like Shourie to support a Big Government Welfare State, I want more reservations. Bring'em on! Yeh dil maangey more!

Make up your mind professor. You wouldn't mind giving up a little growth to send rich OBC/Dalit kids to IIT/IIM/Med schools but the idea to provide mid-day meals to poor school kids appears funny.

We know that Abi is logically challenged and briefly touched upon it here, but didn't know the problem was this severe:

Second, since everyone is in favour of a policy that favours one group (say, the OBCs), the advantage of playing vote-bank politics doesn't accrue to anyone, does it? So, what's the big deal?

Well, you can pretty much extend the logic to any populist measure, can't you professor? Wouldn't that prove that vote-bank politics doesn't exist at all? Or does it only exist when it is politically convenient for you?

But, there was very little passion in the way he pursued the main story line. At some level, he seemed to have reconciled to (the inevitability of) the reservation policy. For example, at one point, he seemd to indicate he would prefer reservations based on economic criteria. At another point, he argued for periodic monitoring mechanisms to keep track of who the real beneficiaries are.

Of course, we will never have any monitoring for the quotas. You see, there is no need, Abi passionately said so!

Dude, where's my manufacturing boom?

If ever there was any effort that was bound to fail at the outset, it was the Doha round of WTO talks. Needless to say, our Hon'ble minister for Commerce and Industry, a very constipated looking Kamal Nath came back home with nada.

The megalomania of our leaders shows no sign of tempering. Remember the Pundit Nehru days when we attempted to become a manufacturing powerhouse by building steel plants? Guess who we partnered with? Yep, the erstwhile Soviet Union. We are still bleeding from those things.

USSR collapsed but we still have those pipe dreams. Drop Rs. 16,000 crores, send rich OBC kids to IIT/IIMs. Problem solved. Might as well adopt the Bernanke solution and drop degree certificates from helicopters in rural areas.

Meanwhile despite the promises of huge incentives by our Hon'ble Prime Minister, farmers continue to commit suicide at record numbers. By now it should have been clear that we need to move large sections of our society from unsustainable areas in the agricultural sector to manufacturing. But with the majority of our leaders busy in social uplifting, that is not gonna happen anytime soon. The failure of the Doha talks means lucrative markets will remain closed to us. Can we bypass the manufacturing boom and move straight into a service dominated economy? Wishful thinking, it didn't happen even for Hong Kong.

The wussification of "liberal" writers

Bharat Mata by M. F. Husain

Amardeep Singh speaks out against the communalization of censorship in the recent issue of Himal Magazine. Ostensibly this is against the backdrop of the recent blog censorship by the Government. In the same issue, there is also a revealing commentary by a certain IAS officer who thinks that the main distinguishing feature of Bombay is its 6 million strong slum dwellers.

Anyway, back to Mr. Singh. In his zeal to appear secular, Mr. Singh presents a colorful canvas of communal censorship and practically covers all religions barring perhaps the Parsis and Buddhists.

Here is a brief list of items grouped by religion that he refers to and which drew communal ire and censorship in most cases:

Christian

The Da Vinci Code

Hindu

Bharat Mata by Husain (Painting)
Deepa Mehta's 1996 Fire
Girlfriend
(Fanaa)
James Laine's book Shivaji: A Hindu King in Islamic India

Sikh

Rahul Rawail's 2005 Jo Bole So Nihaal

Muslim

Salman Rushdie's allegedly anti-Islamic The Satanic Verses
Danish cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed

Political/Government

Michael Edwards' Nehru: A Political Biography was banned in 1975.
Anand Patwardhan's film War and Peace
Rakesh Sharma's The Final Solution
(Fanaa)


The most dangerous idea in Mr. Singh's article is not that all these instances of fanatic behavior should be seen in the same light but the fact that he tries to create an arbitrary standard for what may or may not be deemed offensive:

Certainly the question should be asked: What about images that are specifically created to offend, such as the Danish cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed? Or, along the same lines, what should be done with a film that fans the flame of communal hatred?

Er, Singhji, therein lies the problem. You may think that these were created specifically to offend. Would you agree then that Bal Thackerey was well within his rights to issue a fatwa on Husain? Also, you steer clear from discussing the difference between mere disapproval shown by a community and bloody riots, beheadings and movie theatre bombings.

Do you have the balls to use a Mohammed cartoon instead of Husain's painting in your article?

Miss Photogenic '06

No, not from the Miss Universe '06. See here.

Behind The Blog Ban

We may never get to see the 22 pages long actual list of sites intended to be banned, given that the RTI is being amended. Heck, I believe that the priveleged in India may soon have to start worrying about their Right to Exist. The web archive wayback machine is down at the moment and may take up to a week to come back. Meanwhile here is a collection of excerpts and screenshots from the various banned websites. Enjoy.

HinduUnity.org
[1. http://www.hinduunity.org]

While the site contains a lot of inflammatory statements and in some cases just plain bad language, there is no specific call to eliminate a particular community, nor is there a hit list on the site. They do have a black list but it does not ask anyone to kill somebody. Many links are defunct, some point to discussion boards. A commenter on their board asks if banning inflammatory websites was really the intention, why were these sites not banned? Note that there are hundreds if not thousands of Islamic web sites in operation in India. Many of them call out to Muslims to go on Jihad, eliminate infidels and establish the Sharia law.


The Jawa Report
[2. http://mypetjava.mu.nu Actual URL: http://mypetjawa.mu.nu]

The URL on the list was misspelled. It is easy to see the actual target of the ban was The Jawa Report. This is a conservative blog. No inflammatory speech here and the language is quite civil. The only crime of this blog is that it is highly critical of Islamic militancy and their appeasers. According to the site, the name Jawa has its origins here. The site flaunts the following on their logo:

Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil - Thomas Mann.

The Jawa Reports points out that India still hosts websites and TV stations for the terrorist outfit Hezbollah. This is Jawa report's own explanation of the ban:

Why did India ban this website? And what is the larger meaning of this action?

The short answer to the first question is that we offended Islamists and India is afraid of its own Muslim citizens. The short answer to the second question is that, sadly, it is increasingly becoming evident that liberty may not be able to exist wherever there is a large population of Muslims.

What, specifically, did we do to offend Islamists and their supporters in the Muslim world?

Editors in Pajamas
[3. http://pajamaeditors.blogspot.com]


Once again, another right-wing type blog. There are thousands of conservative blogs. We suspect that these were specifically chosen because at one point of time they carried the controversial cartoons or had posts deemed offensive to Islam.


OpiniPundit
[4. http://exposingtheleft.blogspot.com]

In their own words:

Excuses from the government for the move were all over the board. First we were a vehicle by which the terrorists were transmitting communication between each other, then we were inciting violence with our "doctrine of hate", Now we are categorized as just "highly offensive" to the Indian Muslim community and hence must be silenced in the name of cultural harmony.

This action by the Indian government is as inefficacious as it is transparent, to pander to a group in their society that has them scared sh!tless in the misguided belief that little gestures like this will mollify these people. In their minds it also has the added benefit of portraying them as "doing something" about the Mumbai bombings. Just how stupid do they think you all are?

Pirate's Cove
[5. http://thepiratescove.us]


In their own words:

Anyhow, it is rather strange to be blocked, considering that I have never posted anything anti-India or Hindu. Lots of anti-Muslim stuff, though, like this and this, and lots of other things that would upset a Muslim. They're so touchy, you would think they were Progressives

According to the CIA World Fact Book, the population of India is only 13.4% Muslim. Well, as Kosbat says, screw 'em (the Indian gov't and the Muslim population, not the other people of India.)

Common Folk Using Common Sense
[6. http://commonfolkcommonsense.blogspot.com Site moved to: http://www.commonfolkusingcommonsense.com. The provided URL links to a Japanese language blog about Korean films and TV dramas. Well, don't ask.]


According to these folks:

India is still censoring this website. Apparently, India considers making fun of terrorists and their Islamist supporters more dangerous than the terrorists themselves. I'm #6 (but I'll try harder) on India's list of 17 websites that are being censored.

Following the ban the site published a series of wonderful articles on India's historic past.

My Vast Right Wing Conspiracy
[7. http://bamapachyderm.com]


This blogger has a message for you:

UPDATE 3: I don't usually send out a "welcome" to new readers, but for the Indian readers here for the first time who are coming through a proxy, WELCOME! Just so you know, you won't find any anti-Indian or anti-Hindu stuff here. I'm cool with y'all - I even watch some Indian movies and love books from Indian writers (in English, of course) - really. In fact, if I got some moron leaving comments attacking India here, I'd run them off. That's why it's so weird that I'm banned in India. I can definitely see being banned in Pakistan, but India??? OK, whatever; some dhimmi or Muslim fanatic got his panties in a wad (again!). So again, welcome!

Princess Kimberley
[8. http://prinesskimberly.blogspot.com Now defunct and being used by an American teenager. Content retrieved using web archives]



Merri Musings
[9. http://merrimusings.typepad.com Site moved to: http://www.merrimusings.mu.nu]


A personal blog of a woman who writes mostly about cooking and personal stuff:

Apparently the Indian government feels that Merri Musings (albeit my old url that's no longer in service at http://www.merrimusings.typepad.com) is worthy of being censored so the people in India are not subjected to the content of my blog.

She welcomes you to her blog:

But those of you in India who want to read about Rachael Ray, get a few recipes, read about pedophiles and child molesters (oh, and the occasional political rant) - stop over here - it seems you are still welcome to be here courtesy of your government.

Her offense: at one point of time linking or publishing images considered offensive to Islam.

Macker's World
[10. http://mackers-world.com]


This blogger wrote a message to the Hon'ble Prime Minister of India:

Dear Mr. Prime Minister:

As an American citizen, I am truly disappointed at your government's denial of access for my weblog to reach your citizens. I have never said anything detrimental about India's efforts to fight terrorism, which leads me to sadly conclude that your government has taken this action because I dare to criticize and ridicule the REAL enemy in the War on Terror...and you know as well as I do who I am referring to. It is my hope that you can direct your Cabinet Minister for Communications and Information Technology to rescind the restriction not only against my blog, but also the sixteen others listed in the fax dated July 13, 2006.
Thank you for your attention.

He also has an audio message for you, the people of India. A rough transcript:

The following message is to the Government and people of India. Greetings. My name is Macker. If you are hearing this, you have managed to bypass your Governmen't directive which bans this site from your right to examine it. Here is my message to you. To the Government of India, you are wrong in blocking your citizenry's access to my site or any other individual sites which you have seen fit to block. You are letting a minority of your country control what can or can not be seen by the majority. I don't have to say which minority I am talking about. You know as well as I do, who that is. And to the good people of India, the majority of whom will not be offended by what I have to say: Don't let the minority to push you around. Hold your Government accountable for the actions they have taken in the name of appeasement for that is exactly what they are doing. Stand tall and stand proud, good people of India. We the people of the United States, Canada, Israel and every free country in the world will stand with you. Thank you. That is all.

Dalitstan
[11. http://dalitstan.com Now defunct and leads to a site about paintings. ]

Hindu Human Rights
[12. http://hinduhumanrights.org/hindufocus.html Content taken from http://hinduhumanrights.org]

Quite expectedly the site carries gory images and stories about the carnage at Kashmir and places affected by Islamic terrorism. The specific html does not seem to exist anymore. This site seems to be run by British Hindus and primarily focused on protesting images offensive to the Hindu religion. See their petition here.

nndh
[ 13. http://nndh.com defunct]

bloodroyaltriped
[14. http://bloodroyaltriped.com defunct]

Yahoo Image Search
[15. http://imagesearch.yahoo.com Actual site: http://images.search.yahoo.com/]

Probably blocked because it could be used to search for Mohammed cartoons. Just a thought.

imamali8
[16. http://imamali8.com defunct]

Rahul Yadav's personal website
[17. http://rahulyadav.com]

His only offense seems to be linking the VHP and RSS websites. The site being password protected, we could not see much of it.


It is quite clear that the list was prepared many months back and originated from the fatwa issued by some cleric. Most of these bloggers themselves feel that they were blocked because of their anti-Islamic content.

Don't believe their lies

In his latest article, Shivam Vij, the most recent messiah for freedom of speech (after Arundhati Roy, Dilip D'Souza and most imams), carefully omits the fact that the original CET directive contained a list of sites 22 pages long. Indeed, we were eventually handed over a trimmed list, hastily typed on a piece of paper:


While many from the Congress PR machine initially tried to pass it off as an attempt by the Government to prevent terrorists from communicating, Dilip D'Souza has the most interesting theory:

Another postscript: MadHat has left a response to this post suggesting that this may all have been a typo, and perhaps the government meant to ban princesskimberly.logspot.com (i.e. leaving the "b" off "blogspot) -- which, it turns out, is some elaborate Bible site. ("AmazingBibleStudies", complete with chortling smileys shouting "Oh my Gaad" on top).

How 'bout some journalistic integrity, D'Souza? (We will cover it in our post analyzing the ban).

Here is the funny thing, Dilip somehow manages to pass himself off as a libertarian!

Dilip, it seems to me you're a libertarian (in the traditional American sense) -- is that right? (no pun intended)

Indeed, Dilip's cunning can be devastating for the uninitiated. Casual readers, please exercise caution.

Getting back to Shivam, we think the dude needs some basic lessons in journalism. One word: research. Granted that you were able to create a nice diversion by shifting the blame towards "babus" and incompetence of the ISPs (while conveniently omitting the important detail about the 22 pages), did you have to make those amateurish comments about some of the banned websites? For instance, hinduunity.org does not contain a hit list. Yes, the HTML file is called hitlist. html, but what it contains is a black list.

Hit list <> Black List

Likewise, www.rahulyadav.com is not run by a person who calls himself a member of the VHP.

'Commonfolk Commonsense' is a not a Chinese language blog, it is in Japanese.

Perhaps these minor details are not important to him. We can not expect any better from a welfare parasite weaned on propaganda all his life.