"Repeat a lie a thousand times and it becomes the truth." Dr Joseph GoebbelsIt was a gruesome riot.
Then it became a pogrom.
Then it graduated to genocide.
Hon'ble PM
Manmohan Singh called it Holocaust.
Just a few days ago,
Narendra Modi was invited to HT summit and then to Devil's Advocate.
Modi was never a friend of the media. Why the sudden love?
The sting broke when Sonia Gandhi is in China, with her son and India's crown Prince
Rahul Gandhi.
The PM made no statement.
Sonia is away.
Congress top brass made no statement.
Gujarat Congress leaders are strangely silent.
Why?
[
Update 1]
Interesting newspaper headlines:
- Stung by riot expose,
Modi blacks out cable TV
- After sting,
Modi takes on media
- TV blackout:
BJP writes to CEO for action against Collector
- Collector acted on his own, no order from Gujarat poll panel
- My orders misinterpreted:
Ahmedabad collector
- TV blackout: Distribution of channels resumes
[
Update 2]
So the
Godhra train burning was not a kerosene stove accident? We never knew! Amazing story. At 7:30 AM abduction attempt on minority girl. At 8:00 AM an 800 - 1000 strong crowd is already pelting stones! Spontaneous, sure. But the riots that followed had been carefully and meticulously planned down to the minute detail.
Opinions of legal experts are flowing in faster than gushing water when a dam breaks. It should be clear to anyone with even vague familiarity of the law that none of this is admissible legal evidence. Of course this is assuming we have seen and read all there is to it. Much of it is third person accounts and vague recollections. The
irrefutable proof implicating
Modi is hearsay evidence at best. None received any first person directive from
Modi, not only that, none of the people actually appear to have met
Modi.
According to the law, audio is inadmissible while
videography is allowed in the court of law. This is an important point. If a person is shown accepting money in a bribery sting, it is admissible. We don't know what would it take for criminal cases. Disjointed ramblings pieced together into grainy tapes have very little chance of passing muster in a court of law. The context is not known, neither are the issues they are talking about.
Of course, we still need a forensic expert to go to work on these tapes.
[
Update 3]
Chandan Mitra has a
column on The Pioneer questioning some of the claims of the sting-op, especially the time frame. Apart from lip-sync issues, it is disturbing that the videos provided contain very small portion of the actual transcript. It is questionable how faithful these transcripts are. We hope
Tehelka knows what it's doing, because this will surely snowball into a full blown constitutional crisis.
The reaction of Congress has been bizarre, it
fears Tehelka sting may favour Modi and that the
center could not do anything more. Note that most of the noise is being made by
Lalu. None of the Congress bigwigs have made any statement so far. The editorials have been beating around the bush. Why the pussyfooting? Isn't this a lifetime opportunity to bury the
Hindutva forces?
The Prime Minister can not let the issue at rest. If he believes that the Gujarat riots were as serious as the holocaust and the sting has any credibility at all - he must initiate a constitutional process for the immediate ouster of
Modi. Pakistani newspapers have gone to town on India's
secular credentials. Middle-East papers can scarcely cover their dismay. This sting will have a strong impact on the Kashmir issue.
[
Update 4: Comic relief]
The Tehelka expose on the Gujarat carnage was a "belated attempt" by the Narendra Modi government to boost his sagging image among the voters ahead of forthcoming state assembly elections, Union Textile Minister Shankarsinh Vaghela alleged on Saturday. "This was just an attempt to deflect public attention from the ongoing infighting within the Gujarat unit of the Bharatiya Janata Party," he added.
"It is more like a fake encounter, to build his own image as hardcore pro-Hindu and trying to revive Hinduism," the minister alleged. [link]
Now you heard everything.
[
Update 5]
The sting has already claimed its first victim, in the form of Government counsel
Arvind Pandya. Having cast aspersions on Justices
Nanavati and Shah on record, he is potentially in violation of contempt laws. The story he gave will go down as one of the most absurd tales in the history of legal defense. He claimed that
Aaj Tak had given him a script to read from, for a TV serial, in which his appearance was supposed to add a touch of reality.
Pandya should be jailed just for being stupid. On the other hand, this brings up an important point. While contempt laws are most Draconian in nature, if you so much as frown at a judge you are in contempt - criminal cases tend to overwhelmingly favor the
perp. It will be hard to hang
Bajrangi and the other assorted criminals on the basis of these tapes. This is where encounter killings prove to be especially useful.
Meanwhile, the case is slowly but surely gaining momentum. Rights activists are demanding that the Gujarat elections be called off. Pakistan has claimed the moral high ground and even invoked the
Liaquat-Nehru pact. They will surely raise this issue in the UN with respect to the future of Kashmir.
What was a great opportunity for propaganda in 2002 is proving a little tricky now that Congress is in power. It does not help either that there are other open battlefields, notably with the Left. Since the tapes do not contain anything legally actionable against
Modi, technically (or rather constitutionally) he can not be ousted. We are looking at legal hassles and intrigue like you have never seen before (think of the
OBC quota case in SC and multiply it with the largest number you can think of). What will the PM do if the Muslims unite with a great show of force to demand
Modi's ouster and refuse to back down? You have a civil war right there.
No matter the outcome of this case, the era of sting-ops may be over.
Tehelka has pushed them a bit too far into the territory of fishing expeditions and beyond a reasonable level of objectivity and usefulness.
[
Update 6: Sting premeditated]
Sankarshan Thakur kept
reiterating on TV (when he was not busy rudely interrupting
Chandan Mitra) that the sting had irrefutable evidence of
Modi's involvement. That, in fact is the whole point of the sting, as
RealityCheck pointed out in one of the
best analysis of the situation so far.
Sankarshan claimed that
Bajrangi had
confessed that he had cut open a pregnant woman and pulled out the foetus. In fact
Bajrangi had said that
the FIR on him stated that he had cut open a pregnant woman (
transcript does not mention foetus). This makes it the third version of the foetus story (the other version was supplied by none other than
Arundhati Roy, when her distraught friend and an eye witness called her up to narrate the foetus brandishing incident). Then there was the issue of
Ehsan Jafri. His post mortem stated that he had succumbed to bullet wounds - one of the stung claims he was cut up limb by limb. According to
Sankarshan, the post mortem reports were also doctored.
Suddenly the whole of
Tehelka team is acting all indignant and defensive. They even
answered allegations against the sting on the
Tehelka website. One of the editors,
Shoma Chaudhury, put the casualty count at 2,500.
Remember that
Bajrangi was a non-entity before the media made him a legend of Hindu bride reverse-abductions. This has been going on for a while, even
Tehelka published long articles on him. This clearly proves that they knew very well what they were doing. They want to connect the riots to people as high in the party hierarchy as possible, ultimately leading to
Modi.
They didn't just stumble upon evidence and hurriedly released it. The whole thing was likely engineered and meticulously planned. The questions were very carefully coined well in advance, not a dare devil reporter asking impromptu questions, making use of a windfall opportunity.
Haresh Bhatt was extensively interviewed about preparations during the
Babri Masjid issue. This was seamlessly merged into the post-
Godhra riots. This has naturally spawned
conspiracy theories, some by none other than
Modi's chief detractor, ex-CM
Mehta.
The public will likely parse the whole thing exactly the way
Tehelka had intended it to be parsed, i.e.
irrefutable evidence against
Modi's involvement.
Today, a sessions court handed out verdicts against 11 rioters, which must seem like a joke in the backdrop of this expose. This sting will go very far - expect strong demonstration of Newton's third law here.
Two days after the Army Chief announced that infiltration from Pakistan has gone up, TIMES NOW has exclusive access to a secret Government document that shows that there has been a visible shift in Pakistan's Kashmir strategy.
According to this Intelligence Bureau report, there are three elements to this new game plan; the first is to shift the focus away from violence in the Kashmir Valley, to building up political support within Kashmir. There is also a clear design to extend violence to other parts of India outside of Kashmir. This has been accompanied by the setting up of alternative infiltration routes from neighbouring countries. The final part of this strategy is to expand the recruitment base of militants to the Middle East. [link]
Thanks at least in part to proponents of the revenge theory among our secular friends, the sting revelations will provide the moral backbone to the coming
maelstrom.
[
Update 7: NHRC to review Parzania movie footage]
The National Human Rights Commission has asked for a copy of the 2-hour duration
Aaj Tak TV coverage of the sting, which incidentally shows generous amounts of the movie
Parzania. Meanwhile it is not clear exactly how much raw footage Tehelka has, different versions put it at
over 40 hours,
50 hours and
around 60 hours.
Congress response to the sting remains muted - but nuanced. It has chosen to let its terriers do the barking while the top leaders are avoiding direct reference. Lalu is probably queering the pitch, additionally he is also stirring up the communal hornet's nest in Bihar. The coyness of Congress shouldn't fool you into thinking that they are not involved in the sting. Upon returning from China, Sonia bestowed the Indira Gandhi Award for National Integration on one
Prof. Bandukwalla. That sounds a bell? Well, that's where the
sting started. This is too much of a coincidence.
As a matter of fact, the constant movie references for a purportedly genuine sting is quite disturbing. The men filmed are constantly being referred to as the
cast of characters, Tehelka Editor Shoma Chaudhury chose a movie reference for the title of her
column on HT. You will require some background in order to appreciate her column:
This and other genuine errors in recounting the details of the violence in Gujarat in no way alters the substance of what journalists, fact-finding missions, or writers like myself are saying. [link]
If you are scratching your head, maybe you should not read Shoma Chaudhury's
piece. One wonders why would she need to pontificate so much, going way beyond the scope of the sting (and perhaps way beyond her intellectual depth) and questioning everything about our democracy. While steadfastly maintaining the sting was not political and merely investigative journalism aimed at securing justice for the victims, she ends up exhorting Hindus to vote against Modi.
The real faultline in India today is not between Hindus and Muslims. It is between Hindus and Hindus. If the Hindus of Gujarat are going to re-elect Modi after being confronted with visual proof of what he stands for, we have to aggressively reclaim what being Hindu means.
What started as
irrefutable evidence to nail Modi thus ends up being a moral sermon. No mention of the actual evidence in the tapes or arguments to bolster the case. It's my way or the highway - if you don't believe in the sting, our democracy is flawed or you must be a communal Hindu.
Meanwhile the sting is steadily making its way into the jihadi fables, the ones used to recruit and radicalize impressionable youth to launch deadly terror attacks. If anything, the sting
proved that the train fire was not an accident, yet the newspapers in Middle-East and Pakistan are qualifying it, while reporting the other part at face value:
NEW DELHI: The editor of Tehelka magazine said on Wednesday Muslims in India’s western state of Gujarat were being "hunted like rabbits". Hindu extremists had killed around 2,000 Muslims in three days after Sabarmati Express, a train carrying Hindu pilgrims, was allegedly set on fire by Muslims at Godhra Railway Station. [link] [emphasis added]
With due respect to the Tehelka team, if they have scant knowledge of the Hindu religion, they are even more clueless about the other one. These are a set of people still in denial about 9/11 and other assorted acts of terror. They also believe in kinship. Tehelka afterall is part of the
other camp. In that sense, the sting is an act of whistleblowing and must be true. But since the train fire was not officially accepted, no matter how much evidence you present, it will always be an accident or at worst, a divine act against non-believers.
Tehelka is
selling briskly in the valley. The only question that Shoma Chaudhury must honestly confront and answer is that, is the sting worth more than the terrible cost of bloodshed that will surely follow?
[
Update 8: Have sting, will travel]
Is ace Tehelka reporter and the chief protagonist of the sting operation Ashish Khetan now employed by
Aaj-Tak? When did that happen? Must have been very recently, because Tarun Tejpal vehemently
denied any connection with
Aaj-Tak. This will add a sliver of credibility to Arvind Pandya's astonishing
claims that he made earlier.
As expected, the HC didn't even entertain the demand to
review the tapes, forget about taking any sort of legal action.
Meanwhile, the Tehelka team members are now folk heroes and are acting as such, writing columns, appearing on reality TV style shows and giving interviews. You have to read some of the stuff to believe it. The sting has assumed the status of urban legends now. Absent any forensic analysis and needless to say a critical examination of the raw unedited footage of indeterminate length, the Tehelka folks are laying it on thick and heavy. For instance, Prof. Bandukwala was
mercilessly killed, according to none other than Ashish Khetan. Prof. Bandukwala made a
mysterious reapearence very recently to accept the Indira Gandhi Award for National Integration!
Likewise, Bajrangi had stated on the tapes that his FIR alleged that he had cut open a pregnant woman. This gradually became Bajrangi confessing his crime on tape. Finally we have Bajrangi actually
gloating over a foetus ripped out of a mother's womb on live video!
This is what passes for truth in this country.
Just like the Narmada Dam
movement, the Gujarat riots has become stuff of urban legends. A complete self-sustaining industry has formed around them. The true victims of the riots will never know the obscene amount of wealth made on their blood and bones by the media and secular vultures.
[
Update 9: Frothy editorials]
Shoma Chaudhury and
Sankarshan Thakur really need to take it easy.
Sample this:
A host of men go on national television and admit they have hacked and burnt and deformed other human beings — willfully, gleefully and confidently.
Really? They went on TV just like that? Willfully, gleefully
and confidently?
But the eloquent visionary men who led us then pulled the country away from the madness of the Hindu fanatic and gifted us a nation that was sane and wise and inclusive. We could have gone another route. We could have been Pakistan.
Oh, thank God for small mercies!
Conspiracy is an idler's kaleidoscope, the more you turn the more new designs you see
Keep turning dude, the 'scope is all yours to turn till the cows home.
Meanwhile, a live example of "truth" being savaged can be seen
here.
Tehelka also enlisted the help of intellectuals, as always to bolster their version of "truth". They interviewed none other than
Shashi Tharoor.
Secondly, I could not believe that all the debate revolved around who ordered it, who condoned it, what political stuff is happening around it. What about the people who have said on camera that they did it? Setting aside the question of whose orders they were following, why is action not being taken immediately against people who are cheerfully, essentially admitting to being murderers? Why aren’t they in jail?
Amazing how similar this sounds to what RealityCheck
said almost as soon as the "sting" broke.
Shashi Tharoor goes on to say what must be anathema to secular ears:
Tehelka: Is religious bigotry the only reason for riots?
Tharoor: Religious bigotry is often a flashpoint, but there are other factors. To a degree, there is the competition and contention for resources. People want a bigger share of the pie and they think that by depriving others they will be in a position to get more.
Also read this
editorial piece by Rajdeep Sardesai. Are you thinking what we are thinking?
( to be continued ....)