A ten-dollar bill us in the center of the crossroads. To the north, there's Santa Claus. To the west, the Tooth Fairy. To the east, a radical Muslim. To the south, a moderate Muslim. Who reaches the ten-dollar bill first?
The answer of course is the radical Muslim. All the others are mythical creatures.
I am not sure if I have met any moderate Muslim. All the Muslims I have met in school or at work were devout Muslims, who would keep their austere fast regime during the month of Ramadan, pray five times a day etc.
Recently there was a long discussion on Retributions about the European veil ban. There was an Indian Muslim commenter on the thread called Adnan. There was a Muslima called Mariam too, possibly from Pakistan. Please visit the thread, you may be surprised.
Now a little thought experiment. Imagine the worst Tamil derogatory stereotype you can think of. Then imagine I call Abi by that name. Is he gonna like it? Probably not. The same thing happens when you (meaning the good natured and clueless socialist) picks on Muslims on the street and tries to label them moderate. You have to understand, one of the basic ideas of Islam is how severely you can observe your religion, a tenet all (okay, most, if you feel uncomfortable) Muslims live by. Now, he is just trying to live his life, praying as many times as he can, fasting during Ramadan, hoping to pay a visit to the shrine (subsidized of course) at least once in his lifetime. How dare you jump in and call him moderate? Calling a Muslim man moderate is a grave insult, it essentially suggests he is not Muslim enough.
Moderate Muslims exist in a fantasy land inhabited by the likes of Dlip D'Souza, in anecdotes and stories that win essay competitions. We are supposed to believe that they exist, for if we don't, we are Hindu fascists, right-wing hate monger etc.
[Updates and our views on the Sachar report follows.]

6 comments:
The retrib. thread was a blitzkreig of stats from you!
And the replies were mostly feeble protests that sought to deflect attention from facts and figures, from the wannabe peaceniks and seculars.
I am not a Muslim and I don't plan to be one at all. However, I don't understand the point you are making at all. I have lived in a Muslim country all my life, and many of my Muslms friends are quite liberal and open-minded and very friendly and hospitable while still remaining strong to their faith. So you're wrong in saying there are no 'moderate Muslims' because there are. And one more thing, why is it wrong for someone to follow the tenets of their faith? Why should that suddenly make them 'rigid' and 'intolerant'? If a Muslim wants to fast during Ramadan... why should that be seen as a rigid gesture?
You ask many important questions, I am sure I don't know the answers to everything. For instance this beautiful yet potent phrase:
And one more thing, why is it wrong for someone to follow the tenets of their faith?
Well, my tenet dictates I do not touch any Dalit. Just like your Muzzie friends' tenet is to decapitate Kafirs like me (among other things like polygamy, Sharia etc.). I really don't see anything wrong with either. Naturally Dalits are mighty pissed just as we Kafirs are. After all, getting our heads cut off is not something pleasant (though I daresay, i haven't had the experience yet).
So, just to be on the safe side, I have decided to reside in a place where law enforcement is usually available within minutes of an SOS and unusually efficient too. Therefore it eliminates the nasty problem of my being in the way of someone's faith.
Now, you will vehemently argue it isn't the experience you have had, well, too bad, 'cuz, like you know, as in the old disclaimer, experiences may vary.
Terminology is relative; define moderation and radicalism. I'm sure that there are many Muslims, just like Hindus, who learn there lessons from the good things represented in the religion and do not define themselves by the religion. I certainly do not, and am sure that my Muslim friends don't either.
Good for you man.
Everything is relative, eh?
Post a Comment