Tuesday, December 05, 2006

Question

I had stopped reading some of the socialist blogs. To paraphrase Tolstoy, every good thing in life offers something new, all garbage is absolutely the same. But looks like I may have to change my policy, I may be missing out on much fun.

I came across this utterly astonishing post on KrishWorld (via Nilu).
Milton Friedman could be a great economist but his propaganda (like the one I have linked above) is plain bullshit. I may respect him for the work he has done in the field of economics (like how I respect any other academic) but his propaganda is nonsense.
Now, being the shallow individual that I am, I can only think of one agenda that an academic person can have and that is to prove and promote his academic research and idea.

Anyway.

The question that I have is simple: would it be easier to separate Friedman's research from his agenda or pull Krish's head out of his ass? Just curious.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Krish is a very simple man.

Only two parts function - his mouth and his arse - and both are interchangeable.

reason said...

will you support quotas for people with their heads at the wrong end?

Anonymous said...

Ever heard the saying that vice of the rear admiral is the rear of the vice admiral?

It's like that only. Socialist speak from their ass since mouths's too busy lapping the 'secular' dung.

Hard to say which is end of the alimentary canal stinks less.